Professor
(1990)
Modern Europe
Office: 221 Randall Hall
Hours: Mon. and Wed., 3:40-4:40 and by appointment
Phone: (434) 971-8744 or 924-6414
Fax: (209) 254-6639
E-Mail: megill@virginia.edu
Education:
For a
full cv, see
http://www.people.virginia.edu/~adm9e/
Books:
Historical Knowledge, Historical
Error: A Contemporary Guide to Practice.
Chinese version,
translated by Han Zhao under the title 历史知识 ―― 历史谬误:当代实践导论
[Lishi zhishi -- lishi miuwu: dangdai
shijian daolun] [Historical
Knowledge – Historical Error: An Introduction to Contemporary Practice] (
Russian version, translated by
Marina Kukartseva, V. S. Timonin,
and V. E. Kashaev under the title Историческая эпистемология [Istoricheskaya epistemologia]
[Historical Epistemology] (Moscow: Kanon+ [publisher to the Institute of Philosophy of the
Russian Academy of Science], December 2006). Publication grant from the Russian State Foundation for the Humanities,
awarded March 2006.
Karl Marx: The Burden of Reason (Why Marx Rejected Politics
and the Market).
Prophets
of Extremity: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Foucault, Derrida.
Turkish
translation: Aşirliin
Peygamberleri: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Foucault,
Derrida, transl. Tuncay
Birkan (Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat, 1998 [ISBN
975-7298-32-8]).
editor, Rethinking Objectivity (Durham., N.C.: Duke
University Press, June 1994 [hardcover and paperback eds.]), pp. ix + 342.
co-editor, with
John S. Nelson and D. N. McCloskey, The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences:
Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs.
Korean translation:
Some articles, and other, shorter pieces:
“Historical Representation, Identity, Allegiance,” in Stefan
Berger and Linas Eriksonas,
eds., Narrating the Nation: The Representation of
National Narratives in Different Genres (
“Popper and Marx as frPres ennemis,” in Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, ed. Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford, and David Miller, vol. III, Science: Logic, Mathematics, Physics, Biology, Social Science (Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2007, forthcoming): 227-39.
“History-Writing and Moral
Judgment: A Note on Chapter Seven of Agnes Heller’s A Theory of History
(1982),” in János Boros, ed., Ethics as
Heritage: Essays on the Philosophy of Ágnes Heller
(Pécs,
“What is Distinctive about Modern
Historiography?,” in History of Historiography
Reconsidered: Essays in Honor of Georg G. Iggers, ed. Q. Edward Wang and Franz L. Fillafer (
“History with Memory, History without Memory,” in a Chinese translation by Han Zhao, Academic Research [Xueshu Yanjiu (ISSN1000-7326/CN44-1070)] no. 8 (2005): 84-95 (an edited version of chapter 1 of Historical Knowledge,Historical Error).
Russian translation by Marina Kukartseva, “История и память: за и против,” Философия и ОбЩество [Philosophy and Society] 2005, no. 2 (April), 132-65 (a full version of chapter 1 of Historical Knowledge, Historical Error).
“Globalization and the History of
Ideas,” Journal of the History of Ideas 66 (2005): 179-87.
Russian translation by Prof. Lorina Repina, “Глобализация и история идей, Диалог со временем: альманах интеллектуальной истории (Dialogue with Time: Intellectual History Review) 14 (2005): 11-20.
“Coherence and Incoherence in Historical
Studies: From the
Chinese translation by Han Zhao, published in two parts in Academic Monthly [Chinese periodical], issues of November and December 2005.
“Some Aspects of the Ethics of
History-Writing: Reflections on Edith Wyschogrod’s An
Ethics of Remembering,” in The Ethics of History, ed. David Carr,
Thomas R. Flynn and Rudolf A. Makkreel (
“Intellectual History and History” (critical discussion of Dominick LaCapra, “Tropisms of Intellectual History”), Rethinking History 8 (2004): 549-57.
“Imagining the History of Ideas” (critical discussion of
Mark Bevir, The Logic of the History of Ideas
[
“Does Narrative Have a Cognitive Value of Its Own?,” in Horst Walter Blanke, Friedrich Jaeger, and Thomas Sandkühler, eds., Dimensionen der Historik: Geschichtstheorie, Wissenschaftsgeschichte und Geschichtskultur heute: Jörn Rüsen zum 60. Geburtstag (Köln: Böhlau, 1998), 41-52.
“History, Memory, Identity,” History of the Human Sciences 11: 3 (1998): 37-62.
“‘Grand Narrative’ and the Discipline of History,” in Frank Ankersmit and Hans Kellner, eds., A New Philosophy of History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), 151-73, 263-71.
Russian translation
by Prof. Marina Kukartseva, “ «Великий нарратив»
и историческая
дисциплина,”
in Monstera [Монстера]:
(Философские
проблемы
социалъно-ґуманитарного
знания) no. 4
(ISBN 5-94099-025-8), ed. M. Kukartseva (
Belarusian translation by Mikhola Ramanousky, “„Вялікі наратыў“ і гістарычная навука,” in БЕЛАРУСКІ ГІСТАРЫЧНЫ АГЛЯ [Belarusian Historical Review], Vol. 11, Fascicle 1-2 (20-21) (December 2004): 263-303 (also on the Web at http://txt.knihi.com/bha/11/bha11idx.htm (accessed Nov. 2005).
President, Journal of the History of Ideas, Inc., 2005--
Directeur d'études invité at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales,
Research Fellow, Australian National
University, 1977-79.
Current Research: I
usually work in several different research areas at once. From the late 1990s
to the end of 2001 I was intensively occupied with finishing Karl Marx: The Burden of Reason; my interest in Marx began,
however, much earlier. After that project, I devoted most of my research and
writing efforts to a contribution to the philosophy of history, Historical Knowledge, Historical Error,
to be published by the
Prospective Graduate Students: I expect prospective graduate students to write me
in advance, after having carefully read the relevant material on my personal
web page. Prospective graduate students should not feel obliged to work in my
specific areas of interest. I am willing to supervise a fairly wide range of
19th and 20th century topics that rely on French or German sources. I expect
that my students will be able to use French or German sources in their research
from the very beginning. You need to be competent in French or German
before you come here.
It continues to be difficult to get a tenure-track position
in the field of European history, which is not a growth area. Prospective
students should not underestimate the difficulties involved. It is best to
acquire foreign experience and real competence in a foreign language before
starting graduate school. Intellectual history can’t be done well without a
precise knowledge of language. Teaching in a secondary school in
I should also note that I place quite a lot of emphasis on
the student’s learning of the conventions of the historical discipline.
Students working with me will also need to connect with a fair sampling of my
departmental colleagues.