|
Shugart follows
natural interests to virtual outcomes
 |
|
Photo
by Jenny Gerow
|
| Hank
Shugart |
By Fariss Samarrai
Environmental
sciences
professor Hank Shugart has been called Dr. Shugart
since he was 14 years old.
When
Shugart was a boy growing up in El Dorado, Ark., in the 1950s,
he developed a passion for studying and collecting unusual native
and migratory birds in southern Arkansas. He held a federal collectors
permit, which allowed him to shoot unusual birds for scientific
purposes. He sent these specimens to the Smithsonian and the Museum
of Natural History, along with detailed descriptions of where
they were found, nicely typed by his fathers secretary.
The
stuff must have looked pretty professional, he said. I
started getting envelopes with forms to file addressed to Dr.
Shugart.
At
16, he bought a lifetime membership to the American Ornithologists
Union, which included a subscription to its journal, The Auk.
He still receives it monthly.
I was a naturalist from the start, he said. I
lived in a relatively rural area, and I got out in the woods a
lot.
He
even made spending money by collecting frogs and salamanders for
a biological supply company that sold preserved amphibians to
schools and colleges.
Shugarts
biggest accomplishment as a young naturalist was his sighting
of a snow bunting a tundra bird near a lake in Arkansas.
This was, at the time, the farthest south this bird had been seen
anywhere on earth. Shugart collected that, too, and
sent it to a professor at the University of Arkansas who eventually
became his masters degree adviser.
When
Shugart earned his Ph.D. in 1971 at the University of Georgia,
he produced a dissertation on the habitat selection of small sparrows.
|
There
are two good reasons to use computer models.
First,
they allow scientists to synthesize what they know, to put
together the pieces of a very large puzzle of how ecosystems
work and to discover if important pieces are missing.
Second,
they provide a tool to predict what will happen if the environment
changes.
Hank
Shugart
Director, Global Environmental Change Program
Environmental Sciences
|
He
may have learned a thing or two from all the scientific articles
he read as a boy. He has published more than 300 articles, including
12 books and numerous book chapters.
Along
the way, Shugarts interest in the woods went virtual. He
took a position as a research ecologist at Oak Ridge National
Laboratory in Tennessee and began developing computer models of
forest ecosystems.
He
got good at it.Currently,
Shugart holds the W.W. Corcoran Chair in environmental sciences
and directs the Global Environmental Change Program. He is known
among scientists as one of the leading computer modelers of natural
ecosystems.
As
individual scientists, we dont live long enough to observe
long-term environmental change, Shugart said. Computer
models are one way to get around the problem.
There
are two good reasons to use models, according to Shugart. First,
they allow scientists to synthesize what they know, to put together
the pieces of a very large puzzle of how ecosystems work and to
discover if important pieces are missing.
Second,
they provide a tool to predict what will happen if the environment
changes.
What happens if we add or lose species or if the climate
changes? Shugart asks. We are trying to develop models
that will give us plausible answers.
The
concept of climate change from greenhouse gases is a product of
computer models developed by atmospheric scientists. These climate
models are highly complex; they crunch masses of data to produce
a picture of possible future conditions, allowing scientists to
consider the implications of these changes.
Shugart
and his colleagues have worked with global-scale and regional
vegetation models to evaluate climate change effects. Because
global models of vegetation are large and have many uncertainties,
they tend to produce oversimplified and relatively vague
predictions, Shugart said. But regional models, centering on a
particular place on Earth such as southern Africa, where
Shugart has conducted research for 20 years can provide
much richer detail in their predictions.
We
have a long history of developing individual-based computer models
that keep track of each tree in a forest, providing highly detailed
information about growth and height and other factors, Shugart
said. We are making models that show what natural ecosystems
are like, including both the plants and animals.
By
understanding the dynamics of individual trees, scientists can
gain knowledge of changes in the forest. Ultimately, regional
models with richer detail can be combined to produce better global
understanding.
Researchers
also ground truth their models with actual field and
satellite observations, allowing them to tweak the details for
greater accuracy. This often involves international travel. Shugart,
who travels 40,000 to 60,000 miles annually, recently returned
from Russia, where he is starting a program to study northern
forests.
Shugart
and his colleagues, Steve Macko, Bob Swap and Paul Desanker, also
teach modeling to students internationally. Students from Europe,
Asia, Africa and the Americas have come to U.Va. to learn the
latest techniques in ecosystem modeling. This semester Shugart
is teaching a teleducation course simultaneously to students at
U.Va. and the University of Botswana in southern Africa. The class
is producinge a model of an African village, showing how people
affect the local environment and how local environments affect
people.
Shugart
also is working on a book about how humans have changed the landscape
through history. Each chapter is an animal parable, like
traditional folk tales, he said. For domesticated
animals, the parable is about dogs, derived from wolves.
The
parable becomes a discussion about animal domestication, changes
due to domesticated animals on landscapes, and finally how our
domestication of animals has changed us.
|