| |
Charter
BACKGROUND
Description of the University
The University of Virginia is an agency of the Commonwealth of Virginia
and is governed by the Universitys Board of Visitors. The University
consists of three divisions. The Academic Division and the University
of Virginia College at Wise Division generate and disseminate knowledge
in the humanities, arts, scientific, and professional disciplines through
instruction, research, and public service. The Medical Center Division
provides a full spectrum of patient care services through its hospital
and clinics.
Vision
The University of Virginia is recognized as one of the countrys
premier public universities. Its goal is to maintain this position through
its ability to attract and retain top quality students, faculty, and staff.
The University has embarked on a long-range strategic planning process,
setting the agenda for the third century at the University. The strategic
plan recognizes that the quality of the Universitys administrative
services and information systems must support its strategic vision.
Limits of Infrastructure
The Universitys strategic vision cannot be met with current
administrative systems or processes. The University now supports 24 core
information systems and 26 programming languages. This is in addition
to more than 120 shadow and supplemental systems throughout the University.
Many of the systems and the business practices they support are twenty
to thirty years old. Replacement is past due in some cases, and the risk
of system failure in others increases with time. In 1994 the University
began modifying its processes, policies, and procedures as part of its
new Process Simplification initiative. This effort has been hampered by
the current technology base, which cannot accommodate the technological
requirements of many best business practices.
(The full background and documentation of the need for and cost effectiveness
of the Integrated Systems Project may be found in the ISP Business Case.)
BACK
TO TOP
PROJECT
GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES
Goal
To support the core missions of the University of Virginia teaching,
research and public service and support its strategic vision.
Objectives
- Increased
efficiencies and effective operations
- Improved
customer service
- Better
ability to adapt to growth and change
Strategies
- Install
and implement an Enterprise Resource Planning system
- Modify
and simplify the Universitys administrative processes, consistent
with the capabilities of the software
PROJECT
ORGANIZATION
The successful completion of the Integrated Systems Project requires the
resources of a wide variety of dedicated personnel from throughout the
University. This section of the Project Charter describes the roles and
responsibilities for each of the major partners in the implementation
plan.
Roles and Responsibilities
Steering Committee
The
Steering Committee will assist the Executive Committee and the Project
Director in making key strategic decisions regarding the project and in
resolving certain issues that impact University policy. There will be
periodic updates presented to the Steering Committee by the Executive
Committee and the Project Director. These updates will enable the Steering
Committee members to become advocates for the project and to assist in
communicating the objectives of the project to the University community.
This committee meets approximately three times per year.
Membership:
- Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (Chair) *
- Vice
President and Provost for Health Sciences
- Vice
President and Provost *
- Vice
President for Research and Public Service
- Vice
President for Management and Budget *
- Vice
President for Student Affairs
- Vice
President and Chief Information Officer *
- Chair,
Faculty Senate
- Chair,
University Committee on Information Technology
- Executive
Assistant and Chief of Staff, Office of the President
* Denotes
membership on the ISP Executive Committee.
Executive
Committee
The Executive Committee provides oversight, guidance, and approval for
all major elements of the Integrated Systems Project. The Executive Committee
works closely with the Project Director in reviewing project plans, scope,
and budget and facilitates the resolution of issues to ensure successful
completion of the initiative.
In this capacity the Executive Committee is responsible for:
- Approving
the project plan, allocating resources, and monitoring budgets to ensure
the successful completion of the project
- Resolving
certain issues, policies, and change management items
- Ensuring
that an appropriate project priority is established and resources are
allocated to the project
- Ensuring
the timely and effective cooperation of all schools, departments and
other operating units of the University in providing information and
other required assistance to the project teams
- Actively
helping to remove obstacles and solve problems that are beyond the control
of the Project Director
Membership:
- Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (Chair)
- Vice
President and Provost
- Vice
President and Chief Information Officer
- Vice
President for Management and Budget
BACK
TO TOP
Area Liaisons
/ Advisory Committee
An ISP Advisory Committee of 14 members was established during the planning
phase to provide the ISP with University-wide advice during implementation. It
was expanded to 21 to assure that every University unit is represented.
The committee is comprised of the chief administrative officer from each
of the ten schools, their counterparts from the Library, Facilities Management,
Business Operations and Athletics, and an equivalent representative from
other major business units of the University. The Advisory Committee meets
monthly, or more frequently during specific phases. The implementation
of the Oracle applications requires a commitment of resources from each
unit (department/school/central) to facilitate a successful rollout and
provide ongoing support. Key roles are shown under the ISP Communications
Structure (section X) of this document.
Technical
Advisory Group
An Integrated Systems Project Technical Advisory Group (TAG) will be formed
to provide the ISP with technical advice. Initially this group will be
represented by:
- ISP
Technical Lead (Chair)
- ITC
Director of Applications & Data Services
- ITC
- Director of Communications & Systems
- KPMG
Technical Lead
Other representatives
from the University community will be added as the group works through issues.
The group will initially meet weekly, however, this could change as the
project progresses. The goals of TAG are:
- Project
status and progress
- Issue
resolution of current and anticipated technical issues
- Project
and resource planning/scheduling
- Information
updates on other technical efforts which are external to the ISP, but
which might have an impact to the project in some way
ISP Project
Director (U.Va.)
The
Project Director is responsible to the ISP Executive Committee for the success
of the project. The charge from the committee is to conduct a successful
systems implementation, on time and within budget. The Project Director
will refer to the Executive Committee for approval such issues as:
- Major
increases or decreases to project scope
- Decisions
regarding alterations to the Oracle base code in the software applications
(i.e., modifications).
- Strategic
configuration decisions such as those related to the charging instructions
(general ledger vs. project-centric approaches), alterations to the
Universitys employee master file, etc.
The Project
Director is responsible for:
- Reporting
to the Finance Committee of the Board of Visitors (shared with the Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer)
- Acquiring
all resources needed for the successful completion of the project. These
include:
- Financial
resources
- Human
resources, both from within the University and from consulting firms
and other external sources
- Software,
hardware, etc.
- Other
goods and services
- Conducting,
with the Department of Procurement Services, all contract negotiations
for consulting services, hardware, software, etc., and serving as the
official University contract administrator for all executed ISP contracts
- Serving
as the project representative on all State issues that relate to the
ISP effort, reporting to the Office of the Secretary for Technology,
the State project review committee, etc.; coordinating these efforts
with others at the University who have primary responsibility for State
relations.
- Communicating
both within the University community and outside the University community
about the goals, objectives, status, and plans of the ISP (shares this
role with the ISP Communications Manager)
- Serving
as Chair of the ISP Advisory Committee.
- Making
all resource allocation decisions that affect the project budget, including
both personnel (the number and type of) as well as all goods and services
decisions (shares responsibility with the Associate Project Director
(U.Va.))
- Managing
the project, including creating and maintaining the project schedule,
assuring the timeliness and quality of all team and other assigned deliverables,
etc. (shares responsibility with Associate Project Directors (U.Va.
and KPMG); the Associate Project Director (KPMG) has the primary responsibility
for this function)
- Supervising
the following members of the ISP team:
- Associate
Directors (U.Va. and KPMG)
- Office
Manager
- Training
Manager
- Communications
Manager
- Technical
Lead
- Functional
Lead
- Conducting
all activities consistent with the approved project plan and project
budget
Reports
to the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, who also
serves as Chair of the ISP/PS Steering Committee and the ISP Executive
Committee.
BACK
TO TOP
Associate
Project Director (U.Va.)
The Associate Project Director (U.Va.) shares responsibility with the
Project Director for the success of the project. Is overall in charge
of the project in the absence of the Project Director.
Responsibilities include:
- Sharing
responsibility with the Project Director for all resource allocation
decisions that affect the project budget. Resource allocations include
both personnel (the number and type of) as well as all goods and services
decisions
- Sharing
responsibility with both the Project Director and the Associate Project
Director (KPMG) for all project management duties, such as coordinating,
maintaining, and making changes in the project schedule, ensuring the
timeliness of deliverables and adherence to the Quality Plan and the
Testing Plan. The Associate Project Director (KPMG) has the primary
responsibility for this function.
- Implementing
and maintaining the project budget tracking system, generating the monthly
financial reports and for providing monthly updates on the financial
position to the Core Team
- In
conjunction with the Project Director, creating and managing the project
infrastructure, (i.e., project administrative processes, project policies
and procedures, etc.)
- Working
closely with the Associate Project Director (KPMG) to facilitate an
accelerated knowledge transfer of ERP project management
- Supervising
the Business Analyst
- Participate
in other Core Team activities
- Conducting
all activities consistent with the approved project plan and project
budget
Reports
to the Project Director.
Associate
Project Director (KPMG)
This person is the Engagement Manager for KPMG and is generally responsible
for project operations. Major duties include: project scheduling (coordination,
maintenance, changes), timeliness of deliverables, adherence to Quality
Plan, issues tracking and decision process, and adherence to the Testing
Plan.
Reports to
the Project Director.
Communications
Manager (U.Va.)
The Communications Manager is responsible for designing, implementing,
and maintaining a comprehensive communications effort for the Integrated
Systems Project.
In this capacity, the Communications Manager is responsible for:
- Serving
as a key communication link to faculty, staff, and others about various
project issues and concerns
- Devising
and executing a communication plan for the project
- Constructing
clear and consistent messages about the project and ensuring that the
messages are disseminated to the appropriate audiences through appropriate
vehicles
- Managing
the project website
- Producing
and distributing regular updates on project progress
- Producing
and distributing reports and other documents as required
- Working
with University Relations staff to help communicate the message to internal
and external audiences
- Assisting
with meetings, including agenda review and discussion, scheduling, and
communication
- Assisting
project teams to facilitate the communication of project progress to
campus communities
- Assisting
in the development of training materials
- Identifying
opportunities to present information about the project and to gather
feedback
- Assessing
the effectiveness of our communication strategies on a regular basis
- Conducting
all activities consistent with the approved project plan and project
budget
- Participating
in other Core Team activities
Reports
to the Project Director.
Training
Manager (U.Va.)
The Training Manager is responsible for all aspects of the ISP training
program including design, marketing, scheduling, and delivery. Training
includes end-user documentation, instructor-led training, and web-based
instruction for end-users, functional-managers, and technical-employees.
In this capacity the Training Manager is responsible for:
- Determining
the Universitys training needs and providing solutions
- Designing
and implementing the training strategy
- Establishing
standards for all training materials and project documentation
- Recruiting
and providing instructional designers to the functional teams
- Serving
as a coordination point between training resources and the Instructional
Designers
- Overseeing
the instructional design process
- Ensuring
consistency and quality for training across modules and phases
- Monitoring
trainings effectiveness
- Recruiting
and supervising the training registrar/project librarian
- Creating
and maintaining the projects electronic and hardcopy documentation
libraries using Traction or other software products
- Conducting
all activities consistent with the approved project plan and project
budget
- Participating
in other Core Team activities
Reports to
the Project Director.
BACK
TO TOP
Functional Lead (U.Va.)
The Functional lead is responsible for ensuring that the work of all functional
teams is conducted within scope, is executed by following the proscribed
steps in the established methodology, and other tasks, as may be considered
necessary, are completed throughout all phases of the implementation (i.e.
Envision, Focus, Design Conceptual Solution, Design Solution Details,
Build and Test, Deploy, and Enhance).
In this capacity the Functional Lead is responsible for:
- Executing
and managing project plans in accordance with the project methodology
- Ensuring
that the Module Team deliverables meet the high quality standards established
by the Project Director and the project Quality Plan
- Day-to-day
responsibility for the Module Teams activities
- Ensuring
that the necessary communication takes place between the Module Teams
- Holding
status meetings and issuing status reports to the Project Director and
others as may be considered necessary
- Conducting
all activities consistent with the approved project plan and project
budget
- Participating
in other Core Team activities
Reports to the
Project Director.
Functional Lead (KPMG)
This consultant is assigned to support the Functional Lead (U.Va.). The
consultant will provide Oracle implementation advice and guidance to the
teams in completing tasks and in maintaining the pace of deliverables.
In the initial weeks of the team effort, the consultant will be active
in guiding the teams through the initial deliverables. The consultant
will also work cooperatively with and jointly prepare all deliverables
assigned to the Functional Lead (U.Va.), as contained in the project plan.
Reports to the Functional Lead (U.Va.) and to the Associate Project Director
(KPMG).
Technical
Lead (UVA)
The Technical
Lead is responsible for all technical aspects of the ISP for the duration
of the project. These responsibilities include:
-
Becoming familiar with the technical capabilities and features of all
the software products (both Oracle and third party products)
- Coordinating
and facilitating the provision of all technical resources, including
technical staff, hardware, and software
- Recruiting
technical staff
- Directing
all technical activities for the ISP, based on the project plan, including
software configurations and modifications, report development, data
conversion, interface development, workflow development, Web enablement,
security implementation, data warehousing, version control, quality
assurance, disaster recovery, etc.
- Acting
as a liaison to the University's department of Information Technology
and Communications (ITC), software vendors (Oracle and third party vendors),
the implementation partner (KPMG), and others to meet all technical
goals and deadlines of the ISP
- Ensuring
that the project's technical work environment is maintained (project
server, staff workstations, security, etc.)
- Chairing
the Technical Advisory Group (TAG)
- Identifying
and resolving technical issues as they arise
- Serving
as a reviewer in accordance with the Quality Plan
- Conducting
all activities consistent with the approved project plan and project
budget
- Participating
in other core activities
Reports
to the Project Director
Technical Phase Lead (U.Va.)
The Technical Phase Lead is responsible for coordinating most of the
day-to-day technical activities of the current phase of the project.
The responsibilities of the Technical Phase Lead include:
- Becoming
familiar with the technical capabilities and features of all of the
software products (both Oracle and third party products)
- Executing
the project methodology for technical aspects of the project
- Directing
the day-to-day assignments of the following ISP technical resources:
the TAR Coordinator, the Technical Coordinator (who is responsible for
the technical pool of programming/analyst resources), and the project
DBAs
- Serving
as a coordination point between these technical resources and the Technical
Leads
- Ensuring
that all technical issues are identified and resolved or escalated in
a timely manner
- Communicating
project issues/information to ITC staff (Applications and Data Services
division), as appropriate
- Conducting
all activities consistent with the approved project plan and project
budget
Reports to
the Technical Lead (U.Va.).
Technical Phase Lead (KPMG)
The Technical Phase Lead (KPMG) is responsible for advising the Technical
Phase Lead (U.Va.) on the day-to-day technical activities of the project
and planning for the longer-term technical activities of the project.
The responsibilities of the Technical Phase Lead (KPMG) include:
- Executing
the project plan for technical aspects of the project
- Directing
the day-to-day assignments of KPMG technical staff members
- Ensuring
that all technical issues are researched and approaches are explained
as the resolution may impact the current implementation and on upgrades
- Communicating
project issues to the ISP Technical Lead (U.Va.)
Reports to
the Technical Lead (U.Va.) and the Associate Project Director (KPMG).
Technical Coordinator (U.Va.)
The Technical Coordinator is responsible for coordinating the day-to-day
activities of staff in the technical pool.
The responsibilities of the Technical Coordinator include:
- Becoming
familiar with the technical capabilities and features of all of the
software products (both Oracle and third party products) that relate
to the applications configuration/development
- Reviewing
programming and testing activities of technical staff in the technical
pool (including program analyst/modifier, interface programmers/analysts,
conversion programmers/analysts, unit testers, system integration testers,
report designers, and data warehouse builders)
- Balancing
the workload (making and monitoring assignments) of the staff in the
technical pool
- Ensuring
quality of technical products and that they meet design specifications
- Ensuring
that all technical issues are identified and resolved or escalated in
a timely manner
- Conducting
all activities consistent with the approved project plan and project
budget
Reports to the
Technical Phase Lead (U.Va.).
BACK
TO TOP
LSP
The Local Support Partner (LSP) for the ISP is responsible for providing
technical support for the entire project team. This technical support
includes:
- Ensuring
that the network in the ISP team building is maintained and available
for all ISP team members.
- Providing
and maintaining the ISP project server and the applications that reside
on it (including Traction, Tutor, other project documentation, etc.)
- Providing
workstation support, including ordering, installing, configuring, and
testing new hardware, and repairing broken hardware.
- Providing
help (troubleshooting, fixes, other assistance) to ISP team members
on an as needed basis with regard to workstation software
or hardware.
- Managing
the security access system for the ISP building.
Reports to the
Technical Lead (U.Va.).
Technical Lead Advisor (KPMG)
This consultant is the primary technical expert for the implementation
of Oracle applications. His/her focus will be on supporting the Technical
Lead (U.Va.) and the Technical Phase Lead (U.Va.) during the implementation.
In the initial weeks of the team effort, the consultant will be active
in guiding the teams through the initial deliverables. The consultant
will also work cooperatively with and jointly prepare all deliverables
assigned to the Technical Lead (U.Va.), as contained in the project plan.
Reports to the Technical Lead (U.Va.) and to the Associate Project Director
(KPMG).
Change Management Advisors (KPMG)
These advisors provide part-time support to the Communications Manager
(U.Va.) and Training Manager (U.Va.) in developing approaches to change
management, human resource changes, and training.
The responsibilities of these advisors include:
- Assisting
the Core Team in following the project methodology for Human Resources
and Change Management aspects of the project
- Reviewing
deliverables designed by the Communications and Training Managers.
- Communicating
project issues to the Communication and Training Managers.
Reports to
the Communications Manager (U.Va.), Training Manager (U.Va.), and the Associate
Project Director (KPMG).
Training Registrar/Librarian (U.Va.)
The training registrar is responsible for ensuring that the instructor-led
and web-based training offerings are scheduled, marketed, and updated.
This will ensure that the end-users of the Oracle applications have access
to the education products of the Integrated Systems Project. The registrar
manages the project documentation library, end-user documentation system,
and web-training products.
In this capacity Training Registrar/Librarian is responsible for:
- Project
documentation management
- End-user
documentation coordination
- Instructor-led
training registration
- Classroom
coordination
- Workshop
marketing
Reports to
the Training Manager.
Office Manager
Provides a full range of administrative support services to project director
and members of ISP core team to include:
- Serving
as the procurement, human resources, and payroll officer for the ISP.
In this capacity, prepares, seeks approval for and submits all required
requisitions and payment documents.
- Supervising
the project staff assistant
- Arranging
all project travel including transportation and lodging.
- Serving
as the telephone service coordinator for the project
- Reconciling
all AMO-90 reports and prepares a monthly aggregate report for the project
director.
- Ensuring
that all supplies necessary for project activities are within stocking
limits.
- Scheduling
meetings and arranging meeting logistics for the project director and
members of the core team.
- Serving
as the interface between the project and the Department of Facilities
Management.
Reports to
the project director.
Business Analyst
The Business Analyst will work with the Associate Project Director (U.Va.)
and the Associate Project Director (KPMG) on all aspects of project management
to include:
- Maintaining
and analyzing the project schedule, to include updating the project
schedule, analyzing progress on tasks and deliverables to ensure that
the project stays on schedule, and notifying appropriate individuals
of issues or problems with the project schedule
- Issues
tracking, to include maintaining a database of project issues, monitoring
all issues to ensure that they are resolved in a timely manner, and
recording all solutions
- Financial
management, to include preparing the annual operating budget, performing
on-going analysis of the project budget and expenditures, and assisting
with preparation of financial reports required by the Board of Visitors,
the ISP Steering Committee, the ISP Executive Committee, the Project
Director, or the Project Teams, as appropriate
Reports
to the Associate Project Director (U.Va.).
BACK
TO TOP
Teams
Each
Oracle application will have a dedicated team assigned to design, build,
test, deploy and stabilize the applications. An implementation team is
comprised of three elements:
- several
functional experts (i.e., administrative staff from departments, schools,
and the central office) augmented by advisory members as needed to incorporate
a broad input of ideas
- technical
experts from Information Technology and Communications (ITC)
- KPMG
and/or Oracle advisors in both the functional and technical areas being
implemented
Each team
will have a Functional Team Lead (U.Va.), Functional Team Advisor (KPMG),
Functional Team Members (U.Va.), Technical Track Member (U.Va.), Technical
Track Member (KPMG), and Instructional Designer (U.Va.). All members report
to the Functional Team Lead.
1. Functional
Team Lead (U.Va.)
The
Functional Team Leads will execute the project methodology for their specific
application/s through all phases of the implementation (i.e., envision,
focus, design conceptual solution, design solution detail, build and test,
deploy, and stabilize).
In this capacity the Functional Team Leads are responsible for:
- Becoming
proficient with the capabilities and features of the software application
- Ensuring
the timely completion of all deliverables as defined by the project
methodology and other deliverables as may be considered necessary
- Directing
the assignments of the Functional Team Members and monitoring the status
of the assigned tasks to ensure that each objective is accomplished
in both a timely and high quality manner
- Communicating
with other functional teams to ensure that the cross impacts of redesigned
processes do not conflict with those of other teams
Reports to the Functional Lead.
1. Functional Team Member (U.Va.)
The Functional Team Members will execute the assigned tasks as contained
in the project methodology relative to their specific application through
all phases of the implementation.
In this capacity the Functional Team Members are responsible for:
- Becoming
proficient with the capabilities and features of the software application
- Ensuring
the timely completion of all deliverables as defined by the project
methodology and other deliverables as may be considered necessary
- Communicating
with other application teams to ensure that the cross impacts of redesigned
processes do not conflict with those of other teams.
Reports to
the Functional Team Lead.
1. Instructional
Designer (U.Va.)
The Instructional Designers will design, monitor, implement, and evaluate
a plan to develop tools, applications, and courseware that will assist technical
professionals, functional professionals, and end-users in learning how to
efficiently and effectively use the Oracle applications.
In this capacity the Instructional Designers are responsible for:
- Becoming
proficient with the capabilities and features of the software application
- Collaborating
to design courseware on the effective use of the system and its business
practices.
- Overseeing
a plan to design tools, applications, and courseware that will assist
functional and technical instructors in the delivery of information
- Providing
primary design support to a specific functional team to ensure the delivery
of quality instruction to technical professionals, functional professionals,
and end-users
- Ensuring
the timely completion of all training deliverables related to a specific
functional team as defined by the project methodology and other deliverables
as may be considered necessary
- Communicating
frequently with other ISP teams, other instructional designers, and
the Training Manager to ensure that training is consistent between ISP
teams and phases and to prevent the creation of obstacles for other
teams
- Serving
as the documentation resource for the team
Reports
directly to the Functional Team Lead and is responsible to the Training
Manager for adherence to the Training Plan.
1. Technical
Track Lead (U.Va.)
The Training Track Lead is responsible for:
- Becoming
familiar with the functional and technical capabilities and features
of the software products (both Oracle and third party products)
- Ensuring
timely completion of all module steps as defined by the project methodology
and other steps as may be considered necessary
- Providing
technical advice and counsel to the functional team (serving as a technical
subject matter expert)
- Coordinating
with other project technical staff and management to ensure adherence
to project technical standards and to resolve technical issues as they
arise
- Working
with the Technical Coordinator and the staff in the technical pool to
ensure timely and quality development/configuration of the software
- Acting
as a bridge to the technical development staff in defining and designing
approved customizations and modifications
Reports to
the Functional Team Lead and is responsible to the Technical Phase Lead
(U.Va.) for compliance with technical standards and for completion of
technical deliverables.
1. Functional
Team Advisor (KPMG)
These consultants will have demonstrated experience in implementing the
Oracle application. In the initial weeks of the teams efforts, these
consultants will be active in guiding the team through the initial deliverables.
As the team gathers experience with the application and the project methodology,
the consultants role will shift to that of a team member who assumes the
shared responsibility for completing the deliverables assigned to the
team, as contained in the project plan. Key advisory roles are to explain
the Oracle application to the team, to help the team reach decisions in
a reasonable timeframe, and to maintain the pace in completing tasks.
Reports to the Functional Team Lead.
1. Technical Team Advisor (KPMG)
These consultants will serve as technical advisors to the team and as
mentors to the Technical Track Lead. They will assist in determining the
best technical approach for resolving functional and/or process gaps,
be active team members on their assigned teams, and will assume the shared
responsibility for completing the deliverables assigned to the team, as
contained in the project plan. They will also act as a bridge to the technical
development staff in defining and designing approved customizations and
modifications.
Reports to the Functional Team Lead.
BACK
TO TOP
SCOPE
Initial Implementation Effort: The initial implementation effort
will commence on December 1, 1999, and is scheduled to be completed within
five (5) years.
Oracle applications to be implemented:
Phase 1 - Finance Applications
Description:
This phase will provide the foundation for the Universitys financial
system. The chart of accounts will be redesigned. An integrated accounting
system will be provided that will require significantly less effort in
the area of funds management. Dramatically improved management reporting
capabilities will be provided.
Applications
to be deployed:
General Ledger
Oracle Grants Management and Labor Distribution
Accounts Receivable and Cash Management
Purchase Orders and Accounts Payable
Order Entry and Inventory
Reports and Data Warehouse
Phase
2 - Human Resources and Payroll Applications
Description:
Both the Human Resources Management System (HRMS) applications and the
Payroll applications will be implemented concurrently. These applications
have significant dependencies, as well as dependencies with the financial
applications previously installed.
Applications to be deployed:
- Human
Resources Management System
- Payroll
- Time
Management
- Training
Administration
- Public
Sector Budget
- Fixed
Assests
- Pre-Award
Grants
- Reports
and Data Warehouse
Phase
3 - Student Information System Application (currently under development
by Oracle)
Description:
This phase will provide a replacement for the Universitys current
student information system. The new student information system will provide
more complete integration with the other applications (Finance and Human
Resources/Payroll) and will allow the creation of a more complete electronic
student record which will serve multiple purposes.
Applications to be deployed:
Recruitment
Admissions
Advising
Student Records
Registration
Student Billing
Student Financial Aid
Web and Self-service applications
Reports and Data Warehouse
Data Warehouse:
Initially,
the data warehouse will contain only information that derives from the
Oracle applications. It will be built using Oracle Data Warehouse Builder
and will reside within an Oracle database. Over time, this will become
the Universitys only data warehouse platform.
Units included in legacy systems replacement: Oracle applications
will replace all of the Universitys legacy systems in finance, human
resources/payroll, and student information systems. Once deployed, all
University operating units, including the College at Wise, the regional
centers, etc., that currently use the Universitys legacy systems
will use the Oracle applications. Implementation will be simultaneous
across all operating units; all departments, schools, and central offices
will migrate to the new applications on the same date.
Alternate or supplemental systems: In some areas of the University
(Facilities Management, Business Operations, College at Wise, Darden School,
regional centers, etc.), alternate or supplemental systems are currently
in place that either complement or function in lieu of the Universitys
legacy systems. To the extent that Oracle applications reasonably accommodate
the business needs of these units, Oracle applications will replace these
alternate or supplemental systems. A portion of these systems will be
replaced during the initial five-year implementation effort, simultaneous
with the deployment of the new Oracle applications. The extent of this
initial replacement effort will be determined during the design phases
of each ISP implementation effort. The remainder of these alternate or
supplemental systems will be replaced on a schedule to be developed.
Note: It may be possible for the operating units to migrate to
the Oracle applications with only minimal assistance from the ISP team.
This would allow the alternate or supplemental systems to be abandoned
at an earlier date.
Deployment of new applications: The ISP will deploy several applications
for which no legacy systems currently exist. Examples include, but are
not limited to:
- Accounts
receivable
- Cash
management
- Training
administration
- Inventory
Since in these
cases no legacy systems currently exist, many University units use shadow
or other systems to meet their needs. These units will be expected to implement
and use the new Oracle applications on a schedule to be developed during
the design phases of each of the four implementation efforts.
Medical Center and University-related foundations: Neither the Medical
Center (Agency 209) nor the University-related foundations are included
in the scope of the ISP. However, the Medical Center and University-related
foundations may purchase Oracle products via the Universitys contract
with Oracle.
Common Procurement: During Phase 1b, procurement of goods and services
from both external and internal service providers will be consolidated such
that all segments of both the external and internal procurement processes
(shopping, ordering, and payment) operate from within the same set of Oracle
applications.
Imaging: All ISP teams will be expected to determine whether imaging
should be included in their application design. Imaging should be included
in the design efforts of each team to the extent that this capability will
allow the project to achieve the benefits expressed in the project business
case. The current University plan for imaging is to contract with one or
more software vendors for this capability.
Use of the Internet: To the maximum extent possible, the Internet
will be used as means by which to:
- access
and operate the Oracle applications
- access
the information contained within the Oracle applications and the data
warehouse
- make
entries into the Universitys information systems as part of the
deployment of any self-service application
Interfaces:
Many interfaces will have to be created in order for the Oracle applications
to be deployed. Normally, it will be the responsibility of the ISP team
to create the required interfaces, with assistance from the unit responsible
for the non-Oracle application. However, there may be instances in which
the non-Oracle side of the interface is contained in a unique software
environment. In these instances, it may be more cost-effective for the
unit maintaining the unique software to write either some or all of the
interface program. In this case, the ISP will negotiate the resource requirements
with the unit.
In instances where a unit has received approval to continue to operate
and maintain an application for which Oracle provides a viable alternative,
the unit will be responsible for the cost of creating and maintaining
all necessary interface programs.
Conversions: Some information currently residing in non-Oracle
applications will be converted for use within the new Oracle environment.
The conversion of this information will be a joint effort between the
ISP team and the unit currently maintaining the information. In general,
the ISP team will be responsible for providing the conversion program/s,
and the unit currently maintaining the information will be responsible
for ensuring that all converted data conforms to the new data definition
and standards for data integrity created by the ISP team.
BACK
TO TOP
IMPLEMENTATION
APPROACH
Methodology
The implementation will occur in phases for the following reasons:
- The
University lacks experience in implementing ERP applications and also
lacks experience with Oracle software products
- Implementation
will be comprehensive; all organizational units (departments, schools,
central offices, etc.) will use the deployed applications that replace
the current legacy systems
- The
deployment of these applications will occur simultaneously across all
units
- Educating
students, faculty, and staff on the use of Oracle applications will
be a significant effort and will be accomplished more easily by deploying
in phases
The Student
Information System (SIS) is scheduled as the last application to be deployed
for the following reasons:
- The
initial production version of the Oracle SIS that will contain sufficient
functionality to serve the U. S. higher education marketplace is not
scheduled for release until approximately September 2001
- The
applications have significant dependencies associated with both the
financial and human resources/payroll applications
Oracle Package-Driven
Implementation Methodology (TRACTION), developed by KPMG, will be used to
implement the application and manage the project. The methodology has been
developed from KPMGs Oracle and ERP implementation experience. The
implementation steps, collectively called pathways, are based on Oracles
architecture and ensure that the applications business process capabilities
support the Universitys objectives and needs. Documentation, techniques,
and tools will be focused on exploiting the strengths and business processing
capabilities of Oracle. The Oracle Package-Driven Implementation Methodology
solution pathway guides the team through a series of activities and tasks
beginning with a business vision and ending with implementation of the Oracle
applications.
A key element of the methodology is the generation of a detailed work breakdown
structure in Microsoft Project that is used to track the project. The Work
Breakdown Structure (WBS) is a project management term for the hierarchy
of progressively detailed activities and tasks required to successfully
complete a project. The WBS contains project deliverables, activities, and
tasks.
The pathway is broken into seven phases (Envision, Focus, Design Conceptual
Solution, Design Detailed Solution, Build and Test, Deploy, and Enhance).
Each phase contains additional detail that guides the project team through
the steps required to complete the objectives of the solution pathway. Examples
and techniques are linked to low level activities and tasks to provide the
project team with sample deliverables and tools used on previous engagements.
In addition, the pathway can be viewed differently by all members of the
project team, thus providing a flexible end-to-end implementation tool that
can be used throughout the life of the project.
Changes to the Oracle Applications
The basic approach to the implementation of the Oracle applications
is to rely on the best practices as contained in the delivered application.
There are several reasons for this approach. First, changes to the delivered
application are expensive to design, develop, test, and maintain. Keeping
the application as vanilla as possible eliminates difficulties
when revisions and upgrades are implemented.
Customizations, Modifications, and Bolt-On Applications are types of changes
that will be avoided. Customizations are software components developed as
adjunct processes to the Oracle applications. Modifications are software
changes made to the Oracle applications. These could be changes to the core
software or to the table structure. Bolt-on applications are separate software
packages that must be interfaced to the Oracle application.
Changes to the Oracle application should not be confused with configuration
choices available within the implementation process. These configuration
choices do not impede upgrades to the Oracle application.
Teams will be chartered to look for opportunities to blend the Universitys
current processes into the processes contained within the Oracle applications
as best practices or seek alternative processes that do not require modifications.
All customizations and modifications are considered out of the scope of
the ISP Plan. The time and budget impact resulting from the proposed change
will be evaluated by the Associate Project Director (U.Va.).
Oracle and other software purchased and deployed as part of the ISP effort
will not be customized without the prior written approval of the ISP Executive
Committee. Requests for software customizations will be considered to meet
only the following needs:
- Mandatory
compliance with external regulatory bodies such as the Commonwealth
of Virginia or the Federal government
- To
meet required life and health safety needs
- To
meet a critical business need that can not be accomplished in any other
way
Customizations
and modifications will not be made to the core application code. This
action would invalidate the warranty and limit Oracle technical support
if there were problems related to the software.
Conference
Room Pilot
A Conference Room Pilot (CRP) database instance will be used by the
application teams to test setup scripts, data, process flows, on-line
help, and training materials. A CRP is generally an uncontrolled environment,
allowing application developers and users to experiment without having
to be concerned about the impact their transactions have on testing. Because
the CRP is uncontrolled, it is important that team members maintain external
documentation for the setup values used.
Other key functional and technical users from the University will be invited
to CRP sessions periodically to confirm and assist with proposed changes
to designs made by the application teams
Documentation
The project will record all significant activities as Traction documents.
These documents are termed deliverables. The functional teams are primarily
responsible for producing deliverables that record the decisions that
adapt the Oracle application to the University environment.
Each deliverable will have a unique control name identified within the
Traction methodology. Functional teams will generate the initial documentation.
Documents will be subjected to a review process to ensure completeness
and accuracy. Each functional team will be assigned an instructional design
staff member to ensure that training information is captured as the documents
are developed. Final documents will reside in a common server area under
the security of the Librarian. The Librarian will control access and editing
of the final documents.
Documentation will include design decisions, issues and resolutions, customizations,
modifications, test scripts, test results, and workflow diagrams.
Security
Several software applications will be in use during the ISP implementation
effort. These include:
- Corporate
Time (scheduling software)
- E-mail
(Eudora)
- Traction
(Work Plan, Time Reporting, and TraX Issue Log)
- Oracle
applications.
Security
will be established for each of these applications. The project LSP will
provide access to Corporate Time and to e-mail. Access to the Traction
application will be limited to members of ISP teams unless otherwise approved
by the Project Director. Changes to the Traction schedule will be coordinated
with the Associate Project Director (KPMG). Access to Oracle applications
will be assigned according to the ISP Security Plan.
Training
An administrative system is only as good as an employees
knowledge to use it.
The goal of training is to ensure that every employee coming into contact
with the Oracle applications is provided the knowledge and skills to use
the system with maximum efficiency and effectiveness.
Each ISP team member will be provided training by both Oracle and KPMG
to prepare them to be productive as quickly as possible. Oracle training
will focus on the functional or technical skills the team member will
require during implementation. In addition to Oracle application training,
KPMG and U.Va. members of the project team will provide training on the
project scope, charter, methodology, task assignments, documentation standards,
and implementation timeline for the application assigned to that team
for implementation.
The Instructional Designers will execute the end-user training plan for
the University community with guidance from the Training Manager. This
will include creating, marketing, and providing end-user documentation,
instructor-led training materials, and web-based instruction materials.
BACK
TO TOP
CRITICAL
SUCCESS FACTORS
Sponsorship
- Strong,
stable executive leadership that provides visible and consistent sponsorship
of and support for the project objectives and the project team.
- Commitment
by the project Executive Committee to support universal use of the deployed
applications.
Resources
- Adequate
resources to support staffing, consultants, training and the technical
infrastructure required to meet project objectives.
Project
Management
- A
comprehensive project management plan, with a clear and rigorous methodology
that includes risk assessment, risk mitigation strategies, a quality
control program, and independent third party review of project progress.
- Well
defined and communicated roles and responsibilities to assure accountability,
ownership and quality.
- A
committed and well informed project manager and project team having
a thorough understanding of the project goals and milestones.
- Knowledge
of the integrated system software to quickly identify gaps, ensure proper
system design and avoid potential pitfalls during implementation.
- Experience
in large-scale system installation.
- Knowledge
of industry best practices and viable alternatives for core business
processes.
- A
thorough understanding of known project risks and assumptions by the
Executive Committee and project team.
- A
defined scope for the project.
- Minimal
modifications to the base code of the software. (All modifications will
require Executive Committee approval.)
Community
- The
willingness of the institution to change significantly the manner in
which work is performed through the installation of the software, modification
and simplification of current administrative processes, modified policies
and organizational structure.
- The
willingness of the institution to function as one team in support of
the goals and mission of the project.
- The
ability of the institution to make the decisions to change and simplify
in a timely manner.
- A
continuous process through which to inform and train all levels of the
user community, both pre- and post-implementation.
- A
continuous process through which to seek guidance and cultivate acceptance
of the system by all levels of the user community.
- Continued
commitment on the part of the Commonwealth of Virginia toward decentralization
and improved information technology.
Vendor
- Continued
commitment by the vendor to develop and support software applications
appropriate for higher education.
BACK
TO TOP
ISSUES
AND CHANGE REQUEST SYSTEM AND PROCESS
Click this
link to see an Issues Resolution
Diagram
Issues
Tracking
The Integrated Systems Project will use an Access database, called
TraX, to document and report:
- Issues
- Change
requests
- Gaps
This database
will be located on the same server as Traction but is independent of Traction.
The application will be available to any ISP member through the web. A
simple security database of authorized users will be maintained to limit
outside access to the data.
For each of the areas being tracked (issues, change requests, and gaps),
the system will provide the ability to record new entries, update entries,
query entries, and view the entire table of entries. There is a status
reporting capability that will be used to provide weekly reports for the
teams. This report feature will be used in conjunction with the decision
criteria escalation described in the Issues Resolution Plan. The system
has the added capability to track testing cycles and test cases, if the
teams determine that this tool is the best approach.
BACK
TO TOP
RISK
MANAGEMENT
Inherent in a large-scale implementation such as the ISP are risk
factors that must be addressed to assure a successful implementation.
The ISP has been addressing project risks using methods developed during
the planning phase that will continue through implementation.
Common risks and the approach for resolution include:
- Management
Commitment - The key risk to a successful project is the lack of sufficient
support of the senior management of the University. The ISP Executive
Committee is charged with the responsibility of insuring a complete
and successful project implementation at the University. This committee
currently meets every two weeks with the senior project staff, to include
the KPMG Program Director. The ISP Project Director reports directly
to the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.
- Project
Scope - A defined scope is critical to establish the parameters
of the project, develop a budget for the project and channel the efforts
of the teams. The scope of the project has been developed and documented.
The scope for the ISP identifies the objectives of the implementation,
the particular applications to be implemented and the timing of these
applications. This document will be used to charter the
ISP application teams.
- Project
Plan - The project should be described in a detailed planning document
to ensure that time is well spent, all tasks and responsibilities are
clearly assigned, key elements are addressed in the proper sequence
and the implementation is completed on schedule and within budget. Prior
to initiating the implementation effort, a detailed project plan will
be developed for the Finance phases of the implementation, and a higher-level
plan will be developed for the Human Resources/Payroll implementation
and the Student Information System implementation. The plan will
include detailed schedules and required documents from each team to
record their work effort.
- Broad
Participation - A key success factor is participation from the University
community and acceptance by the users. Without this level of support
and involvement, the applications will not be used to their full capacity.
It is important that both the users and the information technology staff
accept the system. Participation equals involvement. The ISP project
plan includes user involvement in the following four areas:
- Senior
management is actively involved on the ISP Executive Committee
- The
University community is involved on an ISP Advisory Committee and
as individual members of the various implementation teams described
in subsequent paragraphs
- All
the implementation teams will have membership from the information
technology office (ITC)
- The
user community will be involved in testing and training
These relationships
are already in place and functioning.
- Issues
Resolution - The capacity to make timely decisions is an important risk
factor in all ERP implementations. Issues will develop during
the design and implementation phases of the project. The ISP must
be structured to quickly and completely resolve the issues and provide
unambiguous direction to the teams working on the implementation.
- Exit
Strategy - Exit points exist at the conclusion of each phase of the
implementation. The strategy includes the ability to terminate the project
at the end of each phase. To execute this strategy, the University will
purchase Oracle software only to the extent it is required for completion
of each phase of implementation. In addition, separate contracts for
KPMG consulting services will be negotiated for each phase of the implementation
effort. After deployment of the initial suite of financial applications,
described as Phase 1a, the University would have in place a robust general
ledger, grants management and cash receipts system with interfaces to
existing systems within the University of Virginia. Upon completion
of the second phase of the finance implementation, the University would
have in place fully functional purchasing, accounts payable and budget
systems. All of these will be integrated with the applications installed
in Phase 1a.
A more detailed
description of the overall Risk Management Plan is stored in the Traction
library.
BACK
TO TOP
ISP COMMUNICATIONS PLAN
One of the critical success factors for the Integrated Systems Project
is a continuous process through which key stakeholders are informed about
the project and through which project staff are kept informed of the needs
and concerns of the stakeholders. The purpose of the ISP Communications
Plan is to outline that process. The key elements of the Communication
Plan are:
- Who
is responsible for project communication
- To
whom communication will be targeted
- What
information is to be communicated
- How
and how often information will be communicated
- Feedback
sought
- Feedback
mechanisms
- Outcomes
expected
The format
of ISP communications will conform to an established identity system that
includes a logo, a template for the website and a standard layout for
project-related documents. This will help readers identify project information
and separate it from other U.Va. communications.
Project communications will be carried out in accordance with the Communications
Plan located in Traction.
BACK
TO TOP
ISP
COMMUNICATIONS STRUCTURE
ISP
Communications Manager
Responsibilities:
- Provide
Area Liaisons with the information they will need to communicate to
their unit(s)
ISP Training
Manager
Responsibilities:
- Advise
Area Liaisons and Unit/MBU Administrators on carrying out their change
management responsibilities, as requested
ISP Core
Team
Responsibilities:
- Each
Area Liaison will be assigned an ISP Core Team member as point of contact
for information about the project
Area Liaison
Responsibilities:
Serve as facilitator of implementation for their unit(s) in the following
capacities :
- Be
an advocate and change facilitator for their respective unit(s) and
the broader University community
- Be
the primary point-of-contact for the ISP team
- Provide
input and feedback to the ISP team
- Establish
a resource team of Unit/MBU Administrators and Unit Subject Matter Experts
(see below) and others as required in their respective units to help
facilitate focus groups, identify shadow systems and interfaces, assist
with testing, etc.
- Serve
as the primary communication person within the unit(s), and identify
a method for communicating issues such as system updates, changes to
policies and procedures, etc.
- Help
identify and implement changes in policies and procedures
- Provide
a user assessment on training needs for their unit(s)
- Identify
security levels
- Work
directly with University Human Resources on classification and compensation
issues
- Assist
units to revise job descriptions as appropriate, consistent with University
Human Resources guidelines and procedures and organizational structure
- Incorporate
best business practices where appropriate to maximize efficiencies within
the units
- Attend
regularly scheduled meetings
Unit/MBU
Administrators
Responsibilities:
- Identify
all end-users within the unit
- Schedule
end users into training courses and ensure training is attended
- Become
proficient in the policies and procedures relative to Oracles
user administration system
- Assist
the ISP team in determining technical/computer readiness for the unit
- Coordinate
with the Subject Matter Experts to ensure all users have correct profiles/privileges
to perform their business functions
Unit Subject
Matter Experts
Responsibilities:
- Develop
a thorough understanding of the applicable Oracle systems, their functionality
and operational procedures
- Serve
as the primary on-site resource for the unit users
- Serve
as the business process owner in the unit
- Participate
in the training of the unit users (training to fulfill this responsibility
will be provided by the ISP team)
BACK
TO TOP
|
|
|
|