 |
Photo by Andrew Shurtleff |
| Charmaine Yoest |
March
16, 2004
By
Elizabeth Kiem
Charmaine Yoest, a doctoral candidate in U.Va.’s Woodrow
Wilson Department of Politics, is an up-and-coming young expert
on family policy issues.
By normal counts, her 10 years at the University have been
hyper-productive: Her papers on the subject are prolific,
as are her media appearances,
congressional testimonies and academic presentations. She
has written a book on working mothers and is completing
a second
on parental leave policies.
But Yoest’s career must be viewed in the context of a not-so-typical
doctoral student’s family life — she is the 39-year-old
mother of five children, ranging from age 10 to infancy.
“I
hope it’s inspirational to some,” she said of her
ability to pursue her studies and career even with a full capacity
mini-van. “Obviously I couldn’t do what I’ve
done unless my husband was willing to live a nontraditional life
as well.”
Yoest acknowledges that her domestic situation, with
close family near by to step into the child-care breach
and a
husband willing
to reduce his workload significantly to help raise
children, has been unusually conducive to her career. Nonetheless,
she would like to see more families adopt a “nontraditional
lifestyle” to accommodate childrearing and professional
equality among the parents.
“There
is such an emphasis on work and family that sometimes the family
gets lost because people are so focused on ‘how
can we facilitate work?’” she said.
A regular on the political talk-shows, Yoest is careful
with her words, aware of just how politicized the
debate has become.
She is quick to emphasize that her pro-family stance
in no way negates her advocacy for women to pursue
careers and
advanced education, as she has done. The mission,
she says,
is to find
creative ways to do both — and women require the participation
of spouses and employers to do so.
Yoest sees great potential in the United States for
a new work/family order. She says an emphasis on
entrepreneurialism encourages
former breadwinners like her husband to try free-lancing.
Flexible schedules are increasingly available to
American parents,
she says, even outside academia. Yoest sees these
trends as a more promising solution
than uniform
paid-maternity-leave
mandates — even the generous policies common
in European countries.
“More
and more women are looking at their three-month-old, or year-old
child, and saying they don’t want to go back to
their previous work circumstance,” she
said.
In fact, Yoest’s current research project
is a national study of paid parental leave in
academia. Her early findings
show that less than one-fifth of higher education
institutions provide paid leave for new mothers,
and half of those are elite
private institutions. Yoest herself never took
maternity leave, finding that her academic responsibilities
could be managed even
with young children.
“It’s never easy,” she said of creative solutions
to the work/family conundrum, “that’s
part of why I study it as an issue.”
Yoest says her colleagues at U.Va., particularly
her adviser Steven Rhoades, have been
supportive of her
decision to
raise a large family.
“U.Va.
has been amazingly good to me. I’m so fortunate to
have landed here,” she said.
One of two children of academics, Yoest
jokes that she is the family’s “black sheep” because she still doesn’t
have her Ph.D. She has fond memories of proofreading her mother’s
dissertation on the linguistics of presidential debates, and
takes pleasure in the fact that she graduated from Wheaton College
in 1986, the same year her grandmother received a master’s
degree in divinity. Yoest will defend her dissertation
at U.Va. this April.
“I
told people when I got started that my goal was to be done by
the time I was 40, and they just looked horrified,” she
laughed, “but I’m right on target.”
Underlying a comprehensive C.V.,
high-powered credentials and
a demanding family
life, is a remarkably relaxed
woman. If
Yoest is a role model, she is
one who abhors being asked for a blueprint
for success and puts a certain
amount of
faith in fate. She eschews what
she calls “cookie-cutter” solutions
and encourages creative solutions for individuals
and their families.
“You
make your decisions, you put your family first and then things
kind of fall after that. You
can’t always figure out how
it’s all going to work out.”
|