|
July
29, 2004
By
Brian Moriarty
When
the Enron scandal began to dominate the headlines in October of
2001, public confidence in the marketplace began a sharp downward trend. Soon thereafter other headlines—like WorldCom Finds
$3.3 Billion More in Irregularities, Reports of Shredding Intensify
Global
Crossing Inquiry, Lies My C.F.O. Told Me, Act XIII, and The Imperial
Chief Executive is
Suddenly in the Cross Hairs—followed closely in the Enron
scandal’s wake.
 |
| www.corporate-ethics.org |
| From
left: Franklin Raines, Chairman and CEO, Fannie Mae, with
Ed Freeman and Bob Harris at the launch of the Business
Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics in Washington,
D.C., on Jan. 14. |
By
July of 2002, a USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll revealed that only
23 percent of the American public trusted CEOs.
This landmark poll showed that more Americans lacked
confidence in business leaders than ever before. Something was clearly
amiss and a broad spectrum of people—media, politicians
and educators— attempted to diagnose the problem.
Many
pointed their fingers squarely at CEOs while others questioned
whether business schools were in part culpable
for the misdeeds of their graduates. Some blamed
unrealistic Wall Street and investor earnings growth expectations
for the deceptive accounting and reporting practices undertaken
by some firms.
Elis
and Signe Olsson Professor
of Business
Administration R.
Edward Freeman
had a different
diagnosis, one
that he had been
putting forth
long before the
recent wave of scandals. As terrible as these scandals have
been, Freeman held the
view that there is absolutely nothing new about any of them. “Worse,
little has
been fixed by Sarbanes-Oxley or the new accounting commission,” Freeman
claimed in 2002, “because the real issue—the lack of
ethics in our everyday business
relationships—lies untouched.”
Seizing the Moment
In
the summer of 2003, when Darden’s
Communications department contacted the Business Roundtable—an
association of chief executive officers of leading U.S. corporations
with a combined workforce of more than 10 million
employees in the United States—they were hoping to
discover if there were opportunities for the two institutions
to partner on a project. What they found was an organization
that was energized toward making a lasting contribution to
business ethics.
The
CEOs of the Business Roundtable were outraged by the various
instances of corporate wrongdoing. The success
of
the American free enterprise system, they believe, is built
on
public confidence and a merger of corporate and individual
responsibility—which starts at the top.
In
conversations that followed, it quickly became clear to
Freeman and the Darden team—which included Ruffin
Professor of Business Ethics Patricia H. Werhane, associate
Professor of Business Administration Andrew C. Wicks, Dean
Robert S. Harris and Communications staff—that the Business
Roundtable was interested in doing something more extensive
than a standard executive program or a single research project.
“The
Business Roundtable CEOs wanted to have a real
and enduring impact upon business practice,” Freeman says,“ something that would stretch beyond any one company.”
While
there have been other notable waves of business scandals—The
Teapot Dome scandal of the 1920s, the first Firestone scandal
in the 1970s, The Wall Street insider trading
scandals of the 1980s—Freeman holds that there has never
been such widespread recognition among business leaders
and the general public that laws and regulation alone were
not sufficient to strike at the core of questionable business
practice. “I really believe we have a unique moment here
to
make a lasting difference in corporate practice,” says
Freeman. “This is a moment we need to seize.”
Werhane
agrees with Freeman’s assessment. “I’ve
been
teaching business ethics for quite awhile,” she says, “and
this
is the first time that I have seen a very strong, large,
corporate
commitment to really thinking about business ethics
in this way.”
Developing
a One-of-a-Kind Institute
Taking
advantage of the opportunity, Freeman, Werhane
and
Wicks quickly assembled a world-class team of business
ethics
experts from leading business schools from across
the country. The
result of these efforts is the Business Roundtable Institute
for Corporate Ethics which was launched
on January
14, 2004. The Institute—which is housed at Darden—uniquely
brings together the best and brightest academics
from the
field of business ethics to work in partnership
with corporate
leaders to make ethics part of day-to-day business
decisions.
The
Institute has the direct backing and participation of
the 150 CEOs of the Business Roundtable. “The interaction
with and direct access to these CEOs will provide
a wealth of
experience that we can use to develop executive
curricula
and best practices for use by business and by
business
schools,” says Freeman. President of the Business Roundtable
John Castellani says, “The Business Roundtable CEOs’ commitment
to this Institute will allow us to make an enduring contribution for years to come.”
The
Institute is headed by an Executive Director, Dean
Krehmeyer (MBA ’99), who is responsible for its day-to-day
management. Krehmeyer
has extensive financial
and management
experience as a
Certified Public
Accountant and
management consultant.
A Shermet
scholar while a student at Darden, he
also holds an M.S. in Accounting and B.S in
Commerce— both from the
University of Virginia.
Freeman
hailed Krehmeyer’s
arrival as an important moment for the Institute. “We
are thrilled to have Dean back at Darden,” said Freeman. “Getting
the right person to be
the Institute’s initial Executive Director was crucial.”
According
to Krehmeyer, the opportunity to make a significant
impact on business practice was one which
he simply
could not decline. “This is a very exciting undertaking,” he
says. “We have all the key groups very much engaged with this issue—CEOs, leading academics, MBA students, and the
media—and there is a call from all parties to make this a
joint
effort.”
Krehmeyer believes that the Institute’s
work will not only affect business practice, but will help
transform MBA curricula.“ The CEOs
are not only seeking guidance from the
academics, they also want to draw on
their own experience and
knowledge to improve business education,” says Krehmeyer.“ The
CEOs are very concerned about the next generation of business leaders, so we
expect the interaction between business
leaders and academics to be genuine—this is not going
to be a one-way conversation.”
Krehmeyer works closely with the Institute’s
10-member Advisory Council which serves as the “Board of Directors.” The Advisory Council—which
consists of five Business Roundtable CEOs, three academics, an
opinion leader, and
the Business Roundtable President—is responsible for endorsing
the selection of research and project proposals for funding
and for approving the annual budget for the Institute and
its activities.
Assembling a World Class Team
“This
all-star lineup of academics is the ‘secret sauce’ that
is
going to make the Institute successful,” says Freeman. “These
are all leading scholars whose understanding
of business as a
morally rich environment is going
to be of great value to the
business leaders with whom we partner.” The Institute’s
18
Academic Advisors are faculty at
some of the world’s leading business
schools.
As
people with a deep and long-term commitment to combining business
and ethics, the Academic Advisors were
excited to join the Institute. “It has been two years since
the
Enron scandal unfolded and I think a lot of us were waiting
for business executives to take a really proactive stance and
come forward,” says Penn State University Professor of
Organizational Behavior and Academic Advisor Linda Treviño.“
I think this Institute is that kind of bold action that we’ve been waiting for.”
In
this age of branded business schools, projects involving faculty
from a large number of competing schools are
extremely rare. “Most schools have very strict rules regarding
faculty involvement with other organizations,” says Freeman.
“So in order to get the right people on board, it was critical
that this Institute not be the ‘property’ of any one
school." While the Institute is housed
at Darden and named for the Business Roundtable, it maintains
a certain independence
from both. “If this were strictly a Darden thing, we would
not
have the all-star lineup of academics,” says Freeman, “and
if
we were not independent from the Business Roundtable, our
academic freedom and research might be questioned and we
would lack credibility.”
Freeman
says the Institute would not exist in its current form without
the leadership and vision of Dean Robert S.
Harris. “In agreeing to let the Institute function independently,
Dean Harris realized that this issue was bigger than any
one
school,” says Freeman. “He viewed this as an
opportunity to
further Darden’s mission to better society by developing
leaders
on a broad scale and in partnership with other schools.”
Envisioning a Shared Mission
“In
our society, we don’t see business and ethics as going
together,” says Freeman, “we usually see them as separate.” According to Freeman, the problem is all in the joke: “Tell
someone you teach Business Ethics and they’ll say: ‘Isn’t
that an oxymoron, like jumbo shrimp?’ Or they say:‘
Ah … business ethics, it must be a short course.’”
For
Freeman, the jokes reveal that we have set our expectations
for ethical business practice far below where they
ought to be. “The mission of the Institute is to try and
put
business and ethics together so that we no longer
see them
as separate,” he says. Werhane concurs: “We would look
at
any business that does not do marketing or is not
concerned
with production as a very strange business—we should think
of ethics in the same way.”
The CEOs who serve on the Institute’s
Advisory Council share this vision of combining business and
ethics.
Says
Franklin Raines, CEO of Fannie Mae and co-Chair
of the
Institute’s Advisory Council: “This Institute will
bring together
the best educators in the field of ethics, active
business leaders
and business school students to forge a new and
lasting
link between ethical behavior and business practices.”
Hank
McKinnell, Chairman and CEO of Pfizer Inc. and
Institute Advisory Council member, notes that
business leaders
need to embrace the responsibility for implementing
ethical
business practices within their organizations. “Business Roundtable CEOs recognize that setting and
maintaining the
highest ethical standards starts with us,” says McKinnell.
Although the Institute’s mission—putting
business and
ethics together—is clear, the drivers that lead to
unethical
behavior are complex. “We do not expect a silver
bullet
answer,” says Harvard Business School Professor and
Institute
Advisory Council member and Academic Advisor
Laura Nash.
“What
you see here with this group of people is a real commitment
to understanding and testing different hypotheses,
different knowledge bases, on why we see the kind of wrongdoing
that’s making us all scratch our heads.”
Making an Impact
The
Institute will make an impact via a broad program that includes:
ground-breaking research on issues related to ethics
that contributes to the advancement of the field; best corporate
practices to be shared among Business Roundtable members
and non-members; executive education for current CEOs
and future corporate leaders; model curriculum packages on
ethics to help shape curriculum design at graduate schools
of business; and information to be disseminated to a broad spectrum
of concerned stakeholders, including business schools.
According
to Krehmeyer, the Institute has been very productive in its first
few months of existence and the immediate
agenda is well-formed. “We have completed a survey of
Business Roundtable CEOs to identify the most pressing ethical issues they face,” he says, “and we are using
this
information to build the curriculum for our first CEO seminar
that will take place in June.” Planning is underway for the
Institute’s first Senior Leadership Team (SLT) seminar, geared
toward leaders at the “executive suite” level. The
first SLT
seminar will be held this coming October.
Also,
the Institute recently completed a beta-version of a multimedia
ethics simulation in partnership with the Olsson
Center for Applied Ethics and Darden Business Publishing.“We
ran a test of the product with current MBA students,” says
Krehmeyer, “and we think this is going to be a valuable
addition to the MBA curriculum as well as a complement to
company training programs." Freeman says, “Bobby Parmar
from the Olsson Center and Fred Telegdy from Instructional Technology have really done a tremendous job with this
product.” The Institute has also assembled MBA student
focus groups to help determine the value students might
add to—and receive from—the Institute.
One
project the Institute is currently planning is an innovative
survey that will benchmark the state of business ethics
from various stakeholder perspectives (i.e., that of managers,
suppliers, employees, regulators, share holders, the media, etc.). The first survey will be completed by early 2005 and
will be conducted every two years.
Defining Success
According
to Freeman and his colleagues, the absence of business scandals
from the headlines is not a sufficient signal
of success. One lesson to be gleaned from the past scandals
is that they eventually disappear from the headlines and
from public awareness… until the next wave hits. If Freeman
is right, these lulls do not indicate that anything meaningful
has been repaired: rather, they are simply a sign that the
public—falsely believing the problem has been resolved—is
no longer engaged with these issues.
Freeman
believes that the Institute needs to remain vigilant, actively
working to bring business and ethics together
even after the current wave of business scandals disappears
from the front pages. “Ultimately, for the Institute, success means having a positive impact on everyday business practice,” says
Freeman. “Ethics
needs to be a front brain activity within business—to change
practice we need to change our mindset.”
Elmer
L. Andersen Chair in Corporate Responsibility at the University
of Minnesota and Academic Advisor Norman
E. Bowie echoes this thought with a different turn of phrase. “I
have my own kind of criterion for success,” he says, “and
my criterion is that I want this initiative to ultimately be
a
bigger story than Andy Fastow and an even bigger
story
than Enron.”
 |
| From
Left: Hank McKinnell (Pfizer), Franklin Treviño
(Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania of Minnesota), and Bob Harris (Darden) |
ADVISORY COUNCIL
John J. Castellani
President, Business Roundtable
Thomas W. Dunfee
The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania
R. Edward Freeman
Darden Graduate School of Business Administration,
University of Virginia
William H. Gray, III
President and CEO, United Negro College Fund
Hank McKinnell
Chairman and CEO, Pfizer, Inc.
Anne M. Mulcahy
Chairman and CEO, Xerox Corporation
Laura Nash
Harvard Business School, Harvard University
Steve Odland
Chairman, CEO and President, AutoZone, Inc.
Charles O. Prince
CEO, Citigroup Inc.
Franklin D. Raines
Chairman and CEO, Fannie Mae
ACADEMIC ADVISORS
Norman E. Bowie, Carlson School of Management,
The University of Minnesota
George Brenkert, McDonough School of Business,
Georgetown University
Thomas Donaldson, The Wharton School of the
University of Pennsylvania
Thomas W. Dunfee, The Wharton School of the
University of Pennsylvania
Timothy Fort, University of Michigan Business School
R. Edward Freeman, Darden Graduate School of Business
Administration, University of Virginia
Edwin Hartman, Rutgers Business School,
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Thomas Jones, University of Washington Business School
Joshua Margolis, Harvard Business School, Harvard University
David Messick, Kellogg School of Management,
Northwestern University
Patrick Murphy, Mendoza College of Business,
University of Notre Dame
Laura Nash, Harvard Business School, Harvard University
Thomas Piper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University
Diana C. Robertson, Goizueta Business School,
Emory University
Robert Solomon, The McCombs School of Business,
University of Texas at Austin
Linda Treviño, Smeal College of Business,
The Pennsylvania State University
Patricia Werhane, Darden Graduate School of Business
Administration, University of Virginia
Andrew C. Wicks, Darden Graduate School of Business
Administration, University of Virginia
|