|
Grant
To Help University Of Virginia Develop Historical Preservation
Plan
September 22, 2003 --
Being venerable does not always mean being valuable.
At
an institution such as the University of Virginia, which has
some of the most venerated architecture in the United States,
separating
the two can be difficult.
With a building boom under way, the University increasingly faces questions
about the academic value of buildings that have stood for
generations.
Now,
thanks to a $170,000 grant from the Getty Grant Program,
a historic preservation master plan will be
developed to enable University officials to evaluate more
than 100 sites on Grounds. Income from an endowment to the University by
Hunter and Carl Smith will supplement the Getty grant.
“We’re
extremely grateful to the Getty Grant Program for providing
the funding for this comprehensive study,” said Mary V. Hughes, U.Va.’s
landscape architect. “There was a tremendous amount of competition
for this grant money.”
U.Va.
President John T. Casteen III noted that the grant comes
at a time when the University’s architectural landscape
is undergoing dramatic changes. “How
it eventually unfolds will depend as much on how we understand our past
as it does on how we interpret it into a vision for the future,” he
said. “The
Getty grant will help us to focus on our rich architectural heritage
and ways to keep it current.”
That
is precisely the intent of the grant, which is part of Getty’s Campus
Heritage initiative.
“American colleges and universities face unique challenges as stewards
of historic resources,” said Deborah Marrow, director of the Getty Grant
Program and dean for external relations of the J. Paul Getty Trust. “The
Campus Heritage initiative represents the Getty's commitment to helping educational
institutions
across the nation plan for the preservation of
their historic buildings, sites, and landscapes. These grants are
particularly intended to assist the universities in incorporating
preservation into
their campus master plans, allowing them to research the best possible
methods
for future care and maintenance.”
The
preservation plan will provide both an inventory and assessments
of the historical significance
of buildings and landscapes that are
at least
40
years old. It will
document and evaluate defining features and materials of the sites,
and provide recommendations for their preservation and use as part
of the
overall master
plan for the University.
Hughes
noted that as the University grows, there will be considerable
pressure on Central Grounds to
accommodate new facilities.
“Everyone wants to be close to the existing academic core,” she said. “We
need to have a sense of preservation goals in order to make good planning decisions
in the future.
“Further,
in a time of scarce economic resources, having a sense of
priorities will help in allocating dollars in the right places,” she
said.
The
University is renowned for the Academical Village designed
by Thomas Jefferson. That area of the Grounds, with
the Rotunda
and
distinctive
pavilions, has been
named a World Heritage Site by UNESCO.
But
there are numerous other prominent historic sites, including
five designed by
Stanford White of the New York
firm McKim,
Mead & White, among America’s
most prominent architectural firms at the turn of the
last century.
The
minimum age to be listed on the National Register
of Historic Places is 50 years, and the University
has not
yet systematically
evaluated
even those
properties.
The
University has formed a steering committee of leading preservation
experts to help guide the planning
process,
and this fall a
search will be conducted
for a team of preservation consultants to work with
the University Architect’s
Office.
Three
phases are envisioned. First, maps, drawings, correspondence
and other source material
will be
used to prepare a site
history. Second, in April
2004 experts will compile an inventory that not
only details the sites’ history
and condition but also documents repairs and other
work.
Third, buildings and landscapes will be prioritized
on a list of recommendations that will serve as
guidelines for
managing
historic
properties. Each
sites’ potential
for adaptive use will be analyzed, along with health,
safety and fire considerations and any potential
limitations or constraints. The project is expected
to be completed
in December 2004.
While
professionals will do the bulk of the work, students already
are playing
a significant role.
An interdisciplinary
team of
graduate students
from the
School of Architecture has worked over several
summers to trace the development of land
use, roads, topography, water and vegetation
in addition to buildings. They have produced a narrative
history
that identifies
historic
periods and themes.
Students
also will work as research assistants over the next two semesters,
and during
the summer
five
students
will work
as interns.
“They
will be applying what they learn in class,” Hughes
said. “We’ll
be fulfilling Jefferson’s dream of
making the University an architectural classroom.”
Lisa
Reilly, chair of the Department of Architectural
History at U.Va., said, “This
grant will provide an unparalleled opportunity
for our students to apply the knowledge
they are gaining in their courses directly
to
an application similar
to those they will encounter in their careers
after completing their degrees.”
The
Smiths’ gift, a matching grant of
$250,000 given in 1988, reflects their
longtime interest both in the University
and in historic preservation.
Carl Smith, a U.Va. alumnus and former
member of the Board of Visitors, served
as chairman of the Jefferson Restoration
Advisory Board, which oversaw efforts to
preserve the University’s historic
buildings.
Contact:
Lee Graves, (434) 924-6857 |