|
U.Va.-Based
Research Consortium Receives Grant To Study Environmental Outcomes
Of Collaboration
March 3, 2004 --
Communities
are increasingly turning to local collaborative processes to solve
complex environmental problems, such as grazing
land disputes,
forest management plans or conflicts over fisheries management.
The University of Virginia’s Institute for Environmental
Negotiation has received a $300,000 grant from the William and
Flora Hewlett Foundation for its Community-Based Collaboratives
Research Consortium (CBCRC) to study the processes and environmental
outcomes of community-based collaboration. “The idea to fund
research concerning the outcomes of collaborative processes arose
in response to the controversy surrounding their use and the lack
of clear, objective and defensible research about their appropriateness
and impacts,” said E. Franklin Dukes, director of U.Va.’s
Institute for Environmental Negotiation.
What is a community-based
collaborative (CBC) project?
According to the consortium, a CBC
is a community-based group made up of multiple stakeholders that
has been formed by the local community
to focus on public resource management issues, such as national
forests or rivers. These CBCs are initiated by communities to influence
the protection and use of the environment through recommendations
or direct actions. The Hewlett Foundation grant will allow the
consortium to evaluate environmental outcomes and impacts of these
multi-stakeholder processes. The findings from this research will
be of use to agencies, communities and policy makers who are seeking
to learn whether and how to use CBC processes.
“A community may reach agreement on a plan to manage a river
and may have used good data in setting goals for reaching intended
objectives, but factors outside the group’s control may change
the plan’s outcomes,” Karen Firehock, consortium coordinator,
stated. For instance, unanticipated natural events such as a drought,
or a political decision, such as a plan to build a large shopping
mall in the river’s headwaters, may change the environmental
outcomes of the plan.
For example,
the Friends of the Rockfish River in Nelson County, Va., was
formed as an outcome of a multi-stakeholder
process involving
the chamber of commerce, the Virginia Farm Bureau, local environmental
groups, residents, educators and county staff to better manage
the Rockfish River Valley. The group established an action plan
that includes clear goals and objectives and implementation of
projects, such as replanting streamside forests and water quality
monitoring. However, the county is rapidly developing as a bedroom
community of Charlottesville. Other amenities, such as the ski
resort, draw people looking to build vacation and retirement homes.
These development pressures, occurring largely from outside the
community, impact the group’s ability to protect the watershed
from being overdeveloped. Environmental factors also play a role.
A severe drought impacted the watershed in 2002 while flooding
ensued in 2003. Determining how to account for and incorporate
environmental, social and political changes into a watershed management
plan is a complex undertaking. As part of its research, the consortium
will examine existing and field test existing theories, such as
the Complexity hypothesis, to understand these factors.
In addition
to forces outside the group’s direct control,
there are other factors to consider, such the time it takes for
environmental change to be measurable. For example, a management
strategy may take 20 years to show improvement due to the time
it takes for the ecosystem to recover from past damages. Conversely,
change may happen quickly and effects of those changes may go undetected
or be catastrophic. Change also happens at multiple scales, making
it difficult to differentiate between local systems and regional
effects, such as the recent drought that plagued the eastern United
States.
With this new
grant, the consortium will review the many emerging theories
of environmental change and evaluate various
approaches
to measuring environmental, social and economic outcomes of community-based
collaborative processes. Case studies will be conducted to field-test
different approaches to evaluating outcomes. Information collected
through research and field-testing will be evaluated and synthesized
by consortium work groups. A key goal is to translate the findings
of this synthesis into improving the design, practice and implementation
of collaborative processes. Workshops, publications, a national
conference and the consortium’s Web site, www.cbcrc.org,
will provide venues for sharing research findings.
Founded in
1999, the consortium serves as a forum for researchers, agencies,
community
and environmental groups, tribes and facilitators
to share and learn from research concerning collaborative approaches
to environmental management. The consortium provides an online
venue for sharing research, resources and ideas through its free
Web site, www.cbcrc.org, which includes searchable databases of
literature and collaborative projects, discussion rooms, guidance
for ethical research and an online journal. In 2002-03, the consortium
funded nine projects researching the design, methods, uses, applications
and outcomes of collaborative processes. These projects and other
research were presented at the consortium’s national research
conference in September 2003. The full set of papers and presentations
are available on the consortium’s Web site.
The Institute
for Environmental Negotiation, founded in 1980, is part of the
Department of Urban and Environmental Planning in U.Va.’s
School of Architecture. The institute provides mediation and consensus-building
services to the public and private sectors concerning conflicts
and policy choices about land use and the environment. Contacts:
Franklin Dukes or Karen Firebock, (434) 924-2041 |