For Journalists




Testing Teachers Won’t Determine Whether They Are Highly Qualified, Pianta Says

November 17, 2005 -- With a federal deadline looming at the end of the 2005-2006 school year, all public school teachers will need to be assessed state by state to see if they are “highly qualified” under the definition included in the federal legislation, “No Child Left Behind.” They’ll probably be tested on the subject they teach. But U.Va. education professor Robert Pianta says the tests in all likelihood won’t measure real teaching or learning, particularly for elementary school teachers. For example, Pianta’s work shows that neither their years of training nor passing content tests predicts the quality of K-5 teachers’ classrooms or the performance of their students.

Pianta can tell right now that only about 25 percent of first– through fifth-graders are exposed to classrooms offering high levels of instructional and emotional support, even though the vast majority of those teachers fulfills the NCLB definition of “highly qualified”: having full state certification, a bachelor's degree, and demonstrated competence in subject knowledge and teaching.

Pianta, the Novartis US Foundation Professor of Education and Professor of Psychology, has been working on a better way to show what high-quality teaching is all about — developing measurement systems for directly observing what teachers do in the classroom and connecting those observations to how much the students are engaged and succeeding in learning. Observing classrooms is not a new way of gathering information about teaching — in Pianta’s work it is the large-scale objective measurement of thousands of classrooms and the ways observation is linked to support for teachers that is unique, and a direct contrast to how NCLB approaches teacher quality and improvement.

Through his newly established Center for the Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning (CASTL), recently buttressed by more than $7 million from two National Institute of Child Health and Human Development research grants, Pianta has brought together projects at the University of Virginia’s Curry School of Education and collaborated with colleagues across the country, to delve behind the façade of test scores into what makes real learning take place.

Based on thousands of hours of live and videotaped observations from preschool through 5th-grade classes, Pianta and a team of education researchers are documenting how teachers’ social and instructional interactions with children make a difference. In a study just published in the journal Child Development, Pianta and his team show that teachers who provide high levels of instructional support and emotional support for children close the achievement gap for at-risk children — they get higher marks on standardized tests and are better adjusted.

Although at-risk children from low socioeconomic areas need high-quality classrooms and teachers, they are also more likely than their peers not to receive them, in part because it’s hardest to get the best teachers to problematic, low-paying schools. But a clear finding from Pianta’s work is also that for all children, a high-quality classroom experience is mostly a matter of luck — for 1,000 children observed across 1st, 3rd and 5th grades, fewer than 200 are in a moderately high quality classroom on all three occasions.

What does the high-quality elementary classroom that contributes to students’ learning and positive adjustment look like? The children interact with one another and the teacher in a positive manner, the teacher moves around the room monitoring activities and offering support as children need it, using a positive, friendly voice. The teacher notices the subtle ways children show cues for help, and she responds to those cues before children get frustrated or act out; and the children are comfortable asking for help. The teacher provides children rich opportunities to learn and use language; she challenges them to use reasoning and problem solving; and it is clear that students know they are in class to learn and they know what the goals and expectations are for different activities. Daily activities are not passive, such as filling out worksheets; instead the key ingredient of a high-quality classroom is active and focused interaction among teachers and children.

In addition to giving emotional and social support to students, the high-quality teacher uses a variety of formats to keep children interested in course content and gives them a range of opportunities to display and perform new skills. Good teachers give expanded, detailed feedback beyond a right or wrong checkmark on a test.

What is critical about Pianta’s work is that these aspects of classrooms can be observed objectively, and these observations can be conducted in the wide range of K-5 classrooms present all across the country. So in a sense, what research tells us that really matters about classrooms can indeed be assessed, but not by testing teachers. Even more important from Pianta’s perspective, is that once effective, high-quality teaching can be observed and identified, it is possible to use those observations as a target for training and supporting teachers anywhere.

“If we’re serious about training teachers and helping them get better, we should look at how to support them in meaningful ways,” Pianta says.

Using videotapes of these observations, his group provides one-on-one feedback and support to teachers, as well as detailed videotaped displays and explanations of the teaching skills successful teachers use. Pianta and his colleagues at CASTL have employed Web-based technology to provide feedback and support to teachers in Virginia and Wyoming pre-kindergartens in a project called MyTeachingPartner. Pianta notes the interest of states such as Massachusetts and Ohio in his work on observational assessment of teaching quality and is now working on applying these approaches in pre-service, university-based teacher education.

In short, CASTL teaching programs offer an alternative to highly qualified — high quality.

Bob Pianta can be reached by phone at (434) 243-5483 or by e-mail at

Contact: Anne Bromley, (434) 924-6861

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Contact the Office of University Relations at (434) 924-7116. Television reporters should contact the TV News Office at (434) 924-7550.

SOURCE: U.Va. News Services

All press releases from 2004 (Web site)
All press releases from 2003 (Web site)
All press releases from 2002
(Web site)
All press releases from 2001
(Web site)
All press releases from 2000 (Web site)

All press releases from 1999
(Web site)
Press releases from August 1993 through May 1999 (text only archive)

UVa News Sources UVa Top News UVa WebCalendar UVa Home Page UVa News Sources UVa Top News UVa WebCalendar UVa Home Page

Top News site edited by Dan Heuchert (; maintained by Karen Asher (; releases posted by Sally Barbour (
Last Modified:
© 2005 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
Top News Information: (434) 924-7676.

News Sources UVa WebCalendar UVa Home Page News Sources UVa WebCalendar UVa Home Page UVa Top News UVa WebCalendar UVa Home Page UVa Top News UVa WebCalendar UVa Home Page UVa News Sources UVa Top News UVa WebCalendar UVa Home Page UVa News Sources UVa Top News UVa WebCalendar Uva Home Page