AMERICANS WANT A HERO FOR PRESIDENT, BUT THEY'VE BEEN IN SHORT SUPPLY SINCE FDR CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va., July 11 -- What lies beneath the indignation of the media as it covers the Whitewater trial and the resignation of the White House official who gathered confidential FBI reports on Republicans for the Clinton administration? John Milton Cooper Jr., a presidential scholar and history professor at the University of Wisconsin, believes that the public in late 20th-century America holds its presidents to impossibly high standards. The public seeks heroes to serve as president, but can elect only men. How did this happen? And when? That is the topic of Cooper's essay, "Great Expectations and Shadowlands: American Presidents and their Reputations in the 20th Century," in the current issue of the Virginia Quarterly Review. No president in recent memory has approached the stature of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, yet it was his kinsman Theodore Roosevelt who raised the stakes for those holding the country's highest office. Teddy Roosevelt "skillfully exploited the mass media to raise levels of excitement and saliency surrounding emerging issues of the new industrial society, and he also made himself as president and as a person, together with his family, the center of national attention," according to Cooper. For his part, FDR -- who won election four times and served 12 years, more than any other president -- brought the country out of the Great Depression and guided it through the Second World War. Succeeding presidents have had to live "in the shadow of FDR," as historian William E. Leuchtenburg put it in his book of the same name. But the public's continuing "great expectations" of what presidents should accomplish in office, and how they should conduct their private lives, now sets the stage for disappointment no matter who sits in the White House, Cooper believes. "Not just overreliance on the presidency but the requirement of heroism in its holders has denoted political immaturity among Americans," Cooper writes. . Cooper's essay is one of two pieces on political topics in the current issue of the VQR. The other is an engaging look at Spanish politics in the 20 years since the death of dictator Francisco Franco: "Spain Today: Is the Party Over?" by David T. Gies, Commonwealth Professor of Spanish at the University of Virginia. Gies argues that democracy is here to stay in Spain, no matter who is in power. Short fiction and poetry by up-and-coming American writers fill out the issue. For more information on the VQR, which has been published at U.Va. since 1925, or for help in contacting authors, call Staige Blackford, VQR editor, at (804) 924-3124, or Charlotte Crystal, U.Va. senior news writer, at (804) 924-6858. ### July 10, 1996