When
most historians and most people think of Harry Truman they think
of him in the context of the first Cold War president, the architect
of the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, creation of NATO, the
spectacular Berlin airlift, recognition of Israel, and even firing
General McArthur, but I would suggest to you and I hope when we
finish this forum today you will agree with me that the most significant
Truman initiative in terms of the domestic U.S. landscape was
in fact his little noted civil rights crusade. I’ll also
suggest to you that that crusade which I’ve documented in
my book gives readers and gives historians an opportunity to really
see into the soul of this man, but before you can really appreciate
this civil rights initiative by the 33rd president, you have to
look at Truman in two contexts, one, the Missouri of his youth
and the other is Washington, DC, April 12, 1945 when he becomes
our accidental 33rd president.
Missouri
of his youth - 1860 in Missouri right on the eve of the Civil
War, I was astounded to find there were 114,930 slaves out of
a population of 1.182 million citizens. That’s roughly 9.7%
of the state of Missouri on the eve of the Civil War were indentured
slaves. Harry Truman was born 19 years after the war ended, 1884.
He was born to a loving, agrarian family who unfortunately were
racists. Both sets of grandparents owned slaves and his mother,
Martha Ellen Young who he loved dearly throughout her long life
was a bitter woman in regards to Abraham Lincoln and anything
Yankee. That was caused by the fact that age 11 she and her five
siblings were taken off the family farm after the farm had been
pillaged by Yankee soldiers, took their silver, took all their
belongings, slaughtered all their animals. She and her five siblings
and her mother were taken off the farm in an ox cart and incarcerated
in a Union camp in Kansas City because the family were southern
sympathizers.
Harry
Truman attended segregated high school in Missouri. He’s
our only modern American president who only enjoys a formal education
up through high school. He was, however, very literate. Because
he had a severe eye deficiency--he wore glasses--he could not
participate in sports and spent a lot of time part-time jobs and
also in the Independence library where he was a voracious reader
and a great student of history, even as a young man.
Harry
Truman served in a segregated military, of course. Everything
was segregated then and there at the age of 34 found out for the
first time he was a leader. He was assigned a group of 194 enlisted
men from Kansas City, mostly Irish Catholics. Here is WASP Harry
Truman in charge of this rowdy crowd. No one could discipline
them, but when they got Captain Truman they in fact became a unit
devoted to each other and these men in Battery 9 were almost his
surrogate sons, many of them, for the rest of his life. What was
important about that experience beside discovering that he was
a leader was the carnage he saw at the final three months of the
war and he never ever lost his deep respect and profound regard
for the servicemen and women who put themselves at risk. He saw
it first hand.
1922
he ran for elective office for the first time, an administrative
job, county judge in eastern Jackson County. He won. He won despite
the fierce opposition of the Ku Klux Klan and often when you mention
the Klan in the context of Missouri, people say, well, no big
deal. Well, in fact, the Klan was quite a force in Jackson County.
In fact, on Saturday nights, one out of 20 citizens of Jackson
County, Missouri, put on the white sheets of the Klan to attend
meetings. It was a formidable force. Bottom line for Harry Truman--he
grew up in a racist state, grew up the product of a racist family.
He should’ve been a racist.
Fast
forward to April 12, 1945, 7:09 he becomes our president. What’s
Washington all about? I’m an Washingtonian. I was three-year-old
youngster at that point. Washington best described was then an
apartheid city. Everything was segregated--schools, public playgrounds,
public pools, restaurants, hotels. Importantly, even the federal
government. The federal government segregated by an earlier Democratic
President Woodrow Wilson in 1913. That meant, and in my youth
I saw it, but if you went to the Executive Office Building there
were separate restrooms for blacks and whites, separate water
fountains, separate cafeterias. Washington was thoroughly apartheid
and when I was doing research for this book, I found a study that
brought into sharp focus what I remembered as a youth, but I’ll
share this with you.
This is a brief excerpt from a report of the National Committee
on Segregation in the Nation’s Capital, 1948. This is the
words of that study. “Often an alien Negro will be allowed
to eat sitting down at a lunch counter if he has a diplomatic
pass or some other means of proving that he is not an American
Negro. Four Negro students from the British West Indies sat at
a downtown lunch counter. The waitress informed them that they
would have to stand to be served, but when they produced their
British diplomatic passes, she apologized, remarking she didn’t
realize they were `not niggers.’” This is Washington,
DC in the nation’s capital, 1948.
Now,
a lot of people think that segregation was dominant in the South
only. I would suggest to you in 1946 the record is quite different.
In fact, 30 of the 48 states of the Union had separate public
accommodations laws or some form of forced segregation. In addition,
many of you will remember the restrictive covenants that precluded
blacks from living in certain neighborhoods. Eighty percent of
Chicago was subject to a restrictive covenant in 1946. Seventy-five
percent of the new housing in Long Island and Westchester County,
New York, was subject to restrictive covenants, so restrictive
covenants were a pervasive tool throughout much of the country
together with the fact you have 30 of the 48 states with these
laws that mandate segregation in some form.
What
is different for Truman from LJB and JFK of the ‘60s in
confronting civil rights protesting and issues? There was no Black
Caucus. There were no massive national sit-ins, no protests. There
was no widespread editorial concern about pervasive racism in
America. There was no Martin Luther King, but in fact there was
something quite dramatic going on in America. There were 12 million
veterans, a little tidal wave of veterans returning home from
the war in 1946 and 880,000 of those were black veterans, and
what this caused was a reaction on the part of the Klan throughout
the South primarily but in border states also and the Klan became
re-energized and that spawned racial violence.
It’s
hard to document the degree of racial violence in early 1946 because
the media doesn’t pay much attention to it, but there’s
a seminal meeting in regards to U.S. civil rights history that
takes place September 19th, 1946 in the Oval Office and at that
meeting Walter White who was Executive Director of the NAACP brought
in a group of NAACP representatives. White at this point had become
a friend of Harry Truman’s. Truman had met with him just
23 day after becoming President and Truman a month later supported
the FEPC which Roosevelt would not support although Truman had
done it as a senator. He did it writing the House Appropriation
Committee, so Truman and White had established a relationship
of trust by the time this September 19th meeting takes place,
but this meeting I would suggest is the seminal meeting. This
meeting allowed White in an unfiltered fashion to tell Truman
what was going on with this re-energized Klan violence directed
at black veterans and one story particularly had a profound impact
on Harry Truman.
It involved a 27-year-old black Army veteran named Isaac Woodard
who was discharged seven months earlier on February 12th from
Camp Gordon in Augusta, Georgia, and in his uniform, honorably
discharged with his medals on, he boards a Greyhound bus and several
hours later in Batesburg, South Carolina, Sergeant Isaac Woodard
is taken off the bus by the town sheriff, a 210-pound white man
named Linwood Shull. He’s arrested for disorderly conduct.
The allegation is he was drinking beer on the bus with several
other servicemen at the back of the bus. In none of the papers
is there any suggestion there was verbal or physical violence
on the part of Sergeant Woodard. It’s quite unclear what
really happened. What did happen with certainty is the next morning
when the sun came up, Sergeant Isaac Woodard was blind for life.
He had been beaten so badly one eye was blinded and the other
eye was gouged out.
When Harry Truman heard this story in the context of the state
authorities of South Carolina doing nothing for seven months,
he exploded. He literally said enough is enough. Walter, we’re
going to do something about this and the next day, Harry Truman
followed up with a letter to his Attorney General Tom Clark who
ironically his father had also owned slaves, and he said to Clark,
I want a federal investigation of this. This cannot go on. He
also said we have to do something more. We can’t just address
these ad hoc cases of violence. We must do something more.
Six
days later the Attorney General of the United States indicted
the police chief, starts a federal process in federal court in
Columbia, South Carolina. Before the trial ends, however, on November
2nd, 1946, Harry Truman suffers the most humiliating political
defeat of his life when both houses of the Congress go to the
Republicans. Truman wasn’t, of course, up for re-election,
but his popular rating was so low at this point that many candidates
did not want him out campaigning for them. It was a real repudiation
when both houses went Republican for the 80th Congress.
Three days later, however, the trial in Columbia, South Carolina,
concluded after 30 minutes of deliberations by an all white jury.
Not surprisingly, the police chief was found innocent despite
his testimony that he had indeed used the force that blinded the
sergeant for the rest of his life.
One
month later on December 5, 1946, with his popularity at an all-time
low Harry Truman issues Executive Order 9808 which creates the
first ever presidential Civil Rights Commission. Now, young people,
when you talk about the Commission, they kind of shrug. Political
commissions are used all the time to take the heat and rarely
do anything. This is a different Commission. This Commission is,
no. 1, multi-racial. It’s 15 people, chaired by the President
of General Electric, Charles Wilson, leading academics like John
Sloan Dickey from Dartmouth; Franklin Roosevelt’s son and,
importantly, a woman named Sadie Tanner Alexander who was an attorney
for the city of Philadelphia, a black woman, a firebrand. You
do not put Sadie Alexander on your committee if you want a go-along
get-along type commission.
Importantly, Truman also gives it federal subpoena power because
he doesn’t trust his own government in regards to the candor.
He says you have a subpoena power. I want to know what’s
going on. He meets with them personally in the New Year, January
15th, and he said I want from you 15 people documentation of the
degree of racism in America and how we can attack it and I want
a game plan. He gives them a staff at the White House, a 12-person
staff. They have a mandate that they’re to get this report
done before the end of the year. They agree it will October, but
before they even get the report done, Harry Truman knows where
he wants to take the nation and on June 29th, he addresses-- The
first president to ever address the NAACP and where does he do
it? The steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC.
The night before he makes this address he writes his sister. Now,
Harry Truman was a very frugal Missourian and he could pick up
the phone any time, of course, as President of the United States
and call home. Not Harry. Two or three times a week he writes
these long letters either to his mother or his sister and they’re
wonderful letters. At the end of the letter on June 28th, the
night before he’s going to speak the next day to the NAACP,
he closes a letter to his sister this way, “I’ve got
to make a speech to the Society for the Advancement of Colored
People and I with I didn’t have to make it. Mama won’t
like what I say because I end up quoting old Abe, but I believe
what I say and I’m hopeful we may implement it.” Now,
this is not a spin letter. This is a private letter, and he’s
saying I believe what I’m going to say. He’s a 63-year-old
man, but he’s still concerned about what his 94-year-old
mother is going to say about this speech. There was a deep affection
there.
The next day he delivers his civil rights magna carta to a nationwide
primetime radio, 4:00 o’clock in the afternoon. He essentially
says two fundamental points in a very short speech. He says civil
rights reform is a moral imperative. He’s the first president
to put in the context of morality. Not political. Morality. And
he said it’s my number 1 priority that must be done by the
federal government. Now we’re all accustomed to the federal
government now, but imagine the impact of saying that. The state
rights Republicans and southern Democrats saying essentially we
can’t leave it up to you to give constitutional equality
to blacks because you won’t do it. In small communities
in states we can’t leave it to you. We have to do it through
the federal government. This is revolutionary.
Just
a brief snippet from this magna carta. “It is my deep conviction
that we have reached a turning point in our country’s efforts
to guarantee freedom and equality to all our citizens. Recent
events in the United States and abroad have made us realize that
it is more important today than ever before to insure that all
Americans enjoy these rights. When I say all Americans--I mean
all Americans.” Unequivocal. Public. Across the nation.
Causes an uproar.
Four months later his committee comes in with a report, 178 pages,
beautifully documented. It’s the blueprint; 35 explicit
recommendations. He publicly embraces them all. Doesn’t
hesitate. Embraces them all. Washington Post headlines call it
an explosive revolutionary report and the President just two months
from the election year with a Republican Congress embraces them
all. The next year he goes to his Congress, January 7th. When
you start a presidential campaign year, the State of the Union
is your kick-off speech. He says to the Congress, still Republican-controlled
Congress, I’ve got five priorities. The no. 1 priority is
civil rights reform and by the way, I’m going to tell you
members of Congress more about it in the short term. Twenty-five
days later, February 2nd, he sends the first ever comprehensive
civil rights bill to the U.S. Congress, a proposal--10 points,
everything, anti-lynching, voting rights, end of discrimination
in interstate commerce, comprehensive civil rights bill. This
is an election year. First ever. By the way, this legislation
finally gets adopted in the heat of the civil rights upheaval
in the ‘60s, but Harry Truman’s there first with the
blueprint.
Not surprising, a month later Gallup conducts a poll and this
is where it really does become shocking for a politician--82%
of those polled by Gallup opposed Harry Truman’s civil rights
proposal, 82%. And I have to read you Harry Truman on polls, because
it really says it all, [were it] that more politicians felt this
way. These are his words, not mine. “I wonder how far Moses
would have gone if he had taken a poll in Egypt. What would Jesus
Christ have preached if he had taken a poll in Israel. Where would
the Reformation have gone if Martin Luther had taken a poll? It
isn’t polls or public opinion of the moment that counts.
It’s right and wrong and leadership. Men with fortitude,
honesty and a belief in right,” and by the way, at that
point, obviously House member Lyndon Baines Johnson was taking
polls because a month after all this happens he launches his campaign
for Senate, his second and ultimately successful campaign and
who is public enemy no. 1? Harry Truman’s civil rights proposal.
He calls it a sham and a farce. So it was widespread political
opposition to Harry Truman. This is an election year. Harry Truman
is unflinching. He has no intention of backing down.
Now,
before the campaign really starts, another election year thunderbolt
hits the country and it comes on May 3rd, 1948, from the Vincent
court. The Vincent court is headed by Fred Vincent who is not
coincidentally Harry Truman’s best friend in Washington.
He’s a soul mate. They’ve worked together since 1934.
They played cards together two or three nights a week. They’re
best friends. Truman has the fortune of putting him on the Court
as Chief Justice in June of ‘46. A year earlier he had surprised
all the partisans by putting a Republican Senator Harold Burton
on the court, so Truman at this point, May of 1948, has two members
of the Court, but importantly, his best friend, Fred Vincent,
writes the opinion. It’s a 6-0 opinion in Shelly v. Kramer
and in that opinion Vincent effectively throws out restrictive
covenants in America. They’re over. Boom.
So, in an election year, this is another great controversy. It’s
changing the lifestyle of many many Americans instantly. When
I deal with young people sometimes it’s fun to say, hey,
how about it being 6-0, unanimous opinion? What’s that all
about? And people are, oh yeah, that’s right, Supreme Court
has nine members. Well, three of them lived in restrictive covenant
housing. They had to recuse themselves. They couldn’t vote
on the case. We forget, but that’s how pervasive restrictive
covenants were.
At
this point, Harry Truman’s popularity is not increasing
at all, I can assure you. The Republicans on June 24 hold their
convention in Philadelphia. Come up with a dream ticket. The dream
ticket for ‘48--Thomas Dewey, Governor of New York; on the
other coast of the country, Earl Warren, Governor of California.
There was so much concern in the Democratic leadership that Harry
Truman could not be elected largely because of civil rights that
a number of leading Democrats tried to recruit Dwight Eisenhower
to be the nominee for the party. That finally collapsed. It’s
only on July 15th a week before the Democrat convention. That
convention takes place in Philadelphia like the Republican convention.
It’s a free-for-all. Why? Harry Truman’s civil rights
proposal. There’s a fight over the plank that is legendary.
Harry Truman puts forward a plank that is constitutionally anchored
and calls for legislation. The state rights Democrats respond
with a regressive proposal and Mayor Hubert Humphrey from Minneapolis
comes in with a very explicit plank that tracks Truman’s
February 2nd proposal to Congress. It’s a fight that would
shatter the party. The more explicit plank prevails by 69 votes.
The
next night Harry Truman finally is the nominee of his Party, but
it’s not a happy party; 947 delegates vote for Truman, 263
vote for racist Georgia Senator Richard Russell. Only 13 of the
southern delegates vote for Truman and importantly, a statistic
that stunned me because of the make up of the Party today, of
the 1,234 delegates in Philadelphia at that convention, only 17
were African Americans. Imagine that the black leadership in the
Party was so nascent and so de minimus at that point.
Harry
Truman makes a great speech. He wasn’t a great orator but
he outdid himself this night and he blamed all the ills of the
country on the do-nothing Republican-controlled Congress. He also
said Republican Congress, you want to make the country right.
I’ll give you a chance. Come back to Washington. I’m
calling a special session, the Turnip Day Session. Be back in
un-air-conditioned Washington on July 26th. We’ll meet for
two weeks and we’ll see if you can deliver on your plank.
No reason you can’t. You’ve got the leadership. Before
that session started, however, the party really fragmented. July
17th then South Carolina Governor Strom Thurmond creates the Dixiecrat
Party. Two days later Henry Wallace who had been FDR’s vice
president creates the Progressive Party. Essentially the Party
is shattered. Two of the three prongs that Democrats had relied
on, that FDR had relied on for his four victories are gone, the
Progressives, the Southern Democrats.
The Turnip Day Congress starts on July 26th, un-air-conditioned.
Cruel to do that to bring everybody back when they should be running
for office, and Harry Truman was relentless. The first day back
in he hits them with a political 2” x 4”. He issues
two Executive Orders. He doesn’t need their approval, so
with one, 9981 he integrates the military of the United States
and what most people don’t remember and historians overlook,
he simultaneously issues Executive Order 9980 which integrates
the vast federal bureaucracy. He essentially undoes what Wilson
has done in 1913. The federal government is now integrated. The
Turnip Day Session, of course, advances no agenda. It’s
a debacle for the Republicans and he constantly reminds people
and he returns to Independence, Missouri, for the month of August
because campaign started mercifully after Labor Day in those days,
and he goes home to Independence with his wife and daughter who
he loved, and just about everybody in Washington thinks when he
comes back after campaigning, he’ll be a lame duck president.
No one thinks Harry Truman’s going to be elected president.
While
he’s in Independence, he receives a letter from a dear friend,
a man named Ernie Roberts who he grew up with in Independence.
Mr. Roberts has become an industrialist, highly successful and
he writes his friend. I’m going to read you just an excerpt
of this letter and I want you to know these letters were not letters
that we often see today written for spin purposes, leaked. These
were private correspondence that took decades before they saw
the light. This is Ernie Roberts’ letter early August. He
gets it in Independence. “Harry, you can win the South without
the equal rights bill, but you cannot win the South with it. Just
why? Harry, let us let the South take care of the niggers which
they’ve done and if the niggers don’t like the southern
treatment, let them come to Mrs. Roosevelt.”
Now, Harry Truman could write some nasty letters when he was irritated.
He took a week before he answered this letter and I must tell
you, this letter to me was one of the most instructive things
I found in my research. I’ll just read an excerpt of a long
letter. “Dear Ernie. I’m going to send you a copy
of the report on my Commission on Civil Rights and if then you
still have that antebellum, pro-slavery outlook, I’ll be
thoroughly disappointed in you. The main difficulty with the South
is that they are living 80 years behind the time and the sooner
they come out of it, the better it will for the country and themselves.
When a Mayor and a City Marshall can take a Negro Sergeant off
a bus in South Carolina, beat him up, put out one of his eyes
and nothing is done about it by the state authorities, something
is radically wrong with the system. I cannot approve of such goings
on and I shall never approve it as long as I am here. As I told
you before, I’m going to try to remedy it and if it ends
up in my failure to be reelected, that failure will be in a good
cause.”
Bottom
line--I found two black leaders of the time that put it in best
perspective when you look at legacy. One is Roy Wilkins, 1953,
the administrator of the NAACP. “Mr. President, no chief
executive in our history has spoken so plainly on this matter
as yourself or acted so forthrightly. As you leave the White House,
you carry with you the gratitude and affectionate regard of millions
of your Negro fellow citizens who in less than a decade of your
leadership, inspiration and determination have seen the old order
change before their very eyes.”
And
then one final touching letter comes from Mary Bethune who was
the founder of the National Council of Negro Women. “God
bless you, Mr. President. We stand by your philosophy and may
you know that men like you never die. Like Lincoln and Gandhi,
your work will ever be alive in the hearts of the people of the
world.”