|
William
Lee Miller, Ph. D.
Author and Scholar in Ethics and Institutions
Miller Center of Public Affairs,
University of Virginia
"Lincoln's Virtues: An Ethical Biography"
March 17, 2003
William
Lee Miller: It is said that there are more books written about Abraham
Lincoln in English than, who would you guess? Shakespeare and Jesus.
Otherwise, Lincoln.
Lincoln
himself said, when asked about his youth, he quoted a phrase from
Thomas Grey's Elegy in a Country Churchyard: "oh, it's all
subsumed under the phrase simple annals of the poor--the short and
simple annals of the poor." However, as you know, Lincoln,
as to quote Grey's Elegy a little further, did not "end up
a flower born to blush unseen and waste its sweetness on the desert
air," or a "gem of purest rays serene, stuck in the dark
unfathomed caves of ocean." Those are quotations from Grey
looking out on these poor folks in the village in England who are
buried there. That isn't a story about Lincoln.
"His
noble rage," which is another phrase out of the poem, of course,
did not lead to a destiny obscure. The day would come when "ambition
and grandeur" far from mocking this poor man's useful toil,
or hearing his tail with a disdainful smile, would pay a king's
ransom to sleep one night in his white house bedroom.
So,
why do I come to write another book about Lincoln? You might say
there are plenty of books about Lincoln already, stretching across
shelves. I came to Lincoln, knowing most of my life that someday
I would, to illustrate and work with topics of political ethics.
What I have written is not a straight biography. Instead, I told
the story of his life up to the point of his coming presidency with
a few glances ahead. But, I told it with selecting what one could
say about his conduct, his moral shaping, his choices, and his virtues.
Abraham
Lincoln is an unusually good subject for such a thing because of,
obviously, the subjects with which he dealt in his life--slavery,
union, war. He was unusually conscientious. Then, he turns out to
have been a man who thought more, expressed more. If you take up
any of Lincoln's speeches, you will find a good deal of discussion
of ethical problems and moral life and reflection in each of the
areas I was talking about. Not only in condemning slavery, a giant
moral evil in which he's leading a political career, but also in
other ways that he would talk about.
To
be sure, everyone knows about "Honest Abe." But, when
you read him and work on it, you discover the much more complex
human being who dealt, for a good deal of his writing, in a complex
way with moral problems.
Though
it is a good project for an ethical biography that you all have
heard of Abraham Lincoln and have some impression of him, one of
the problems with doing this is that the legends and the myths get
in the way because you are going to stipulate right away. I say
Abraham Lincoln was not born on Mount Rushmore. The editor wanted
me to say that Abraham Lincoln was not born with his face on Mount
Rushmore, but neither one was true--he wasn't born there and he
wasn't born with his face there, either. He didn't have his face
already on the penny. He didn't come into this world as a certified
hero with his memorial on the mall. He was born as you and I were--as
a bear and girdling baby, who to be shaped free within some limits,
to make of himself what he would.
As
I read, I found all these things that others around him did that
Lincoln did not do. So, I gathered them together in a chapter called,
"Noble Rage," which is a phrase out of Grey's Elegy, and
I listed them all and here is the paragraph that comes at the end
that summarizes it:
"In
a society of hunters, Lincoln did not hunt. Where many males shot
rifles, Lincoln did not shoot. Among fisherman, Lincoln did not
fish. Among many who were cruel to animals, Lincoln was kind. Surrounded
by farmers, Lincoln fled from farmers as fast as his long legs would
take him. With a father who was a carpenter, Lincoln did not take
up carpentry. In a frontier village preoccupied with physical tasks,
Lincoln resisted manual labor. In a world in which men and some
women smoked and chewed, Lincoln never used tobacco. In a rough,
profane world, Lincoln did not swear. In a social world in which
fighting was a regular male activity, Lincoln, though very strong
and he could lick you if you did fight, was a peace maker. In a
hard drinking society, Lincoln did not drink."
When
a temperance movement, spawned by the same evangelical protestant
movement that spawned the anti-slavery movement, swept across the
country and Lincoln is asked to speak, he does not join in their
condemnation of drinking or do it the way they do.
"In
an environment soaked with hostility toward Indians, Lincoln resisted
it. In a time and place in which the great mass of common men in
the west supported Andrew Jackson, Lincoln supported Henry Clay.
Surrounded by Democrats, Lincoln became a Whig. In a political party
with a strong nativist undercurrent--a period of spreading anti-Catholic
and anti-immigrant notions, Lincoln rejected that prejudice. In
a southern flavored setting soft on slavery, Lincoln opposed it--"I
have always been opposed to slavery. I cannot remember anytime that
I wasn't. If slavery isn't wrong, nothing is wrong," said Lincoln.
"In a white world heavily prejudiced on race, Lincoln was generous
to black persons. In an environment indifferent to education, Lincoln
cared about it intensely."
When
you see what Lincoln didn't do, then you ask, "well, what did
he do?" And, what he did was read books. I put together a paragraph
that I don't have with me here of all the places saw him reading.
He cared about education and he was a little disdainful of Pigeon
Creek because there was no ambition there for education, including
a little criticism of his father.
His
family active in church, Lincoln did not join. Even when evangelical
Christianity permeated the western frontier, young Lincoln raised
questions. He wrote something that was so scandalous that his friends
were careful to burn it because it would hurt him politically if
it was found. He read Tom Paine, he liked Robert Burns, particularly
the poems about smug Presbyterian elders who were sure they were
elect looking down on those who were not.
In
his days in New Salem, he was self-molded morally by taking seriously
a lot of this material out of these 18th and 19th century classic
essays in these readers. "Act well your part, there all the
honor lies." Lincoln is writing to General David Hunter after
the war starts. Hunter is complaining because he is not getting
a big enough command. Lincoln's quote is from Alexander Pope's Essay
on Man. He didn't have any staff bringing him quotations. That came
out of his head.
The
combination of his life story with the great power of the civil
war presidency might have created a moral monster, a tyrant indeed.
But, that did not happen. His ego would not be stoked and enlarged
by his rise from nowhere all the way to the supreme position, or
inflated by the immense position that he held once he got there.
On the contrary, the higher he went and the greater his power, the
worthier his conduct would become. Something like the opposite of
Lord Acton's dictum.
Even
more notable than young Lincoln's rise to eminence from unpromising
beginnings, would be the fact that it would not corrupt him, but
something like the reverse. Lincoln would become a great man, but
he would also become, over time, a great man who is also a good
man.
Now,
the shaping of his mind. The world of Lincoln biography does not
do enough with his intellect. I put together a whole series of episodes
in which you would come to hear this gangly fellow, whose pants
wouldn't reach his shoe-tops, who had a Hoosier accent during his
Cooper Union Address, and who wasn't particularly handsome. Then,
he begins to speak and it repeatedly happen. They look at each other
in wild surmise and think that this is pretty intelligent stuff
from this unlikely source. A very important part was that he wrote
his own stuff and he taught himself to write and think well.
Now
he picks a role in life. He could have been a journalist, or written
novels. He could have been a businessman like friends. He could
have fallen in love with the river on those two trips he took, like
Mark Twain's life on the Mississippi. But, he was a politician.
If Abraham Lincoln is not a politician then words have no meaning.
Part of my design in this book, of course, is to get people over
the automatic negative response to the word and the concept of a
politician.
At
23 and after only six months in this new place, he announces for
the state legislature: "I hope to win the esteem of my fellows
by doing something worthy of their esteem." It is kind of touching,
this first reason why he wants to do it. It is pretty good for a
statement by somebody about what it is you are going to do by your
life. He served in the state legislature, became an organizer in
the Whig Party and became awful good at it. If you look through
his letters, an awful lot of them are about the politics of Illinois,
then later the politics of the whole country.
I have
two or three pages of quotes in which I played around with Grey's
Elegy in a Country Churchyard--how it does and doesn't apply to
Lincoln. Here is some more:
"He
was not going to be content to keep the noiseless tenor of his ways,"
Grey said about these English peasants, "in the cool, sequestered
vale of life." This cool, sequestered vale of a farmer's life
was exactly what he wanted to get away from. He was not going to
stay complacently a long way "from the madding crowds of noble
strife." That is Grey, you will recognize. He was going to
head right toward it by running for the state legislature--a madding
crowd if you ever saw one-- almost before he got his saddlebags
unpacked. If the state legislature of a rapidly growing state on
the American frontier is not ignoble strife of a madding crowd,
I don't know what would be.
In
that setting, he develops an ethical outlook that I use Max Weber's
classic essay, "Politics as a Vocation," which contrasts
an ethic of responsibility, which takes account of the anticipated
consequences of action. An ethic of responsibility person like Lincoln
would say that if the heavens fall, it is pretty serious business.
Where are they going to fall an d who are they going to fall on?
Or, do justly and leave the result to God, as an abolitionist correspondent
said to him when he was arguing. These correspondents also said
that if the liberty-folk had voted for Henry Clay instead of James
Polk, then people wouldn't have gotten in the Mexican War, and a
whole series of things would not have happened. These were the Ralph
Nader supporters of their time.
Another
element of an ethic of responsibility. "He has to take into
account the average deficiencies of mankind," political realism
stated by Max Weber. However, Weber's essay finds these two coming
together at certain moments--the ethic of ultimate conviction and
the ethic of responsibility. Lincoln also has those points in his
life where he, to put it in the terms that we always do, does not
compromise exactly because of the consequences of doing so.
I end
the book with Secession Winter, which means there's Lincoln, President
Elect, and while he waits to become president, the country states
are peeling off. He is sitting in a dingy back office in Springfield,
getting away from people who want office or reporters, so he can
write himself, out of his own mind, his inaugural address. He has
to figure out what to say in that setting. Part of what he does
is that he corresponds with the Republicans who are wondering if
he is really going to be their new leader. He says two things.
One,
no compromise on the point of additional territory of slavery. It
is a kind of containment relationship for slavery. The other one
is on the point that slavery is a monstrous injustice. He has an
interesting exchange, which I quote some parts of, with his old
acquaintance, Alexander Stevens, who becomes the Vice President
of the Confederacy. They knew each other from having been Whig congressmen
together in Lincoln's brief appearance in the United States Congress.
Stevens says that he knows Lincoln won't come and take away slavery
in the southern slave states, but the fact that Lincoln morally
disapproves is enough for us to have to withdraw. Lincoln is not
going to change that. He holds to the moral disapproval and containment
of slavery with a chain of steal. His strength of will was grounded
in strength of mind. It is a little different from ego.
When
Lincoln gets to the White House, he has absolutely no honeymoon.
Do you remember that from reading Lincoln biographies? On Inauguration
Day, March 4th, Buchanan and his Secretary of War Joseph Holt get
the letter of Major Anderson at Fort Sumter and its enclosure saying
that they did not have enough food to last past the middle of April
and that the Confederates had built up the batteries around Charleston
Harbor so that it would take a disciplined army of twenty thousand
men to protect Fort Sumter. The entire United States army was seventeen
thousand and they were spread out in clusters in the west dealing
with Indians. So, obviously, you have to surrender. General Winfield
Scott, the great military man of the time, said that they had to
withdraw the force from Fort Sumter. Then my last line is, "but
the new president did not surrender."
Return
to UVA NewsMakers Home |