|
Excellence in the 21st Century: Planning
Initiatives at the University of Virginia
As the 1998-99 academic year begins, the University of Virginia is embarking on a
long-range strategic planning process aimed at ensuring excellence in four areas:
Fine and performing
arts
International programs
Public service and
outreach
Science and Technology
These initiatives will involve broad dialogue, intensive study, and thorough
deliberation. Participants will be asked to approach the planning process with clean-slate
thinking, but at the same time to draw upon their experience, their knowledge, and their
familiarity with the University to create a vision for the first part of the 21st century.
The process then will involve a focus on action plans tied to specific goals, timeframes,
and funding requests.
The four areas of planning are based in individual schools and departments throughout
the University. Yet, the planning process will emphasize the interdisciplinary ties that
already exist, among them graduate and undergraduate studies, teaching, scholarship and
research, and local and international perspectives. All will be encompassed by this work.
Planning Structure
Preliminary activities have involved formation of a structure to enable the planning
process to proceed in a manner that is inclusive, participatory, and thorough. The
structure sets the stage for both "top-down" and "bottom-up" reporting
and review. Three primary groups are responsible: the University Planning Council; the
Planning Commissions; and the Project Management Team.
The University Planning Council (UPC) is a deliberative body composed of senior
University staff. The UPC will provide oversight for the entire planning process and will
serve as the final review entity on recommendations and implementation plans.
Four Planning Commissions have been created one for each major initiative.
A faculty member will chair each commission, and the members will represent
complementary interests and backgrounds. Most members will be from the faculty. Others
will include University officials, students, alumni, and other constituents.
The Planning Commissions have these primary
responsibilities:
Define the scope of
programs included in the review
Assess current strengths
and weaknesses
Determine appropriate
benchmarks and aspiration groups
Evaluate opportunities
for achieving excellence
Set priorities and goals
for implementation, including strategic investment in programs (personnel,
facilities, support services, etc.)
The commissions will use work products from existing and ongoing planning efforts,
including the Provosts Program Review process and the master plan for the
Carrs Hill Arts Precinct. External peers will assist the commissions by providing
concept papers that offer broad assessments and stimulate initial discussion. These
individuals and other objective external reviewers will provide critical review, or
"vetting," of the commissions recommendations.
A project management team will provide logistical support and coordinate research,
communications, decision support, and analysis for the UPC and the four commissions.
Communication efforts will include maintenance of a Web site to disseminate information
about the planning initiatives and to post the commissions work for responses from
the community at-large.
Conclusion
The initial phase of the strategic planning process will carry the University into the
first part of the 21st century. This process follows the successful planning efforts of
the 1990s. The past ten years can be characterized as a time in which disciplined choices,
thoughtful planning, and restructured finances have supported progress and enhanced
quality in many areas of the University. Success, however, is a process, not an event
and not a single ranking held over time. This process is expected to serve as a
template for future planning to maintain and enhance the University.
The rewards of this long and painstaking effort will be great. As the president said in
his March 1998 State of the University address: The benefits will be more powerful
teaching, better prepared graduates, greater impact on the communities we serve, and
greater value in all University degrees.
|