Guide :: Exempt Research :: Exempt vs. Approved
How is an exempt protocol different from an approved protocol?
Exempt protocols and protocols that require IRB approval both must submit IRB protocol forms and all additional materials as needed. However, an exempt protocol has some definite advantages compared to a protocol that needs IRB approval.
Shorter review time
Exempt protocols go through our expedited review process. An exempt protocol is reviewed by a pre-reviewer and then sent to a Board Member, who gives the final designation of exemption. On average the review can take two weeks, though this can depend on the number of protocols in the queue. A protocol that needs full board review usually requires at least one month for review. For more information about the review process, please see Submission: Review.
Modified consent requirements
If a protocol is exempt, the Board does not have to require the researcher to consent participants. In some cases, providing the information on a consent form is advisable. For more information about consent issues, please see the Consent: Exemption.
No continuous review
Exempt protocols are given a four year “open protocol” status. During that time, our office will contact you once pre year via email to find out if you are still collecting data, etc, to which you need only respond. Approved protocols are required to submit requests for continuation every year as the approval period is only granted for one year. If the exempt study will continue beyond four years, you will be asked to resubmit the protocol with an explanation of the current status of the study.
<< Previous: Archival Data | Next:Submission>>
Guide :: Exempt Research :: Exempt vs. Approved |
