 |
 |
Direct Deposit Team Final Report
January 30, 1997
Executive Summary
Purpose of the Direct Deposit Team
The Direct Deposit Team was created in 1996 as part of the Process Simplification
effort taking place at the University of Virginia. The purpose of this
team was 1) to analyze the distribution of payroll/stipend payments
and earnings statements to employees and stipend recipients and 2) to
suggest improvements which would increase efficiency and cost effectiveness
while reducing personnel requirements.
This Executive Summary provides an overview of the Direct Deposit Team's analyses,
recommendations, and implementation plans. More detailed information
on each of these subjects can be found in the attached proposal.
Payroll Distribution
Analysis of Current Situation:
The team's analysis of payroll distribution revealed the following:
* The following number of employees and stipend recipients still receive
paper checks on payday even though direct deposit is available.
Salaried
Employees: 1,564 (17%)
Wage Employees: 4,394 (52%)
UVA Temps: 700 (50%)
Stipend Recipients: 1,258 (74%)
Total Checks per Month 7,916
Total Checks per Year 94,992
- The bank charges 5.77 cents more to process a paper check than to process a direct
deposit transaction. As a result, the University spends an additional
$4,128 per year to cover the incremental banking costs associated with
issuance of paper checks.
- Distribution of payroll is a very labor intensive task. A total of
7.75 FTEs (6 FTEs in academic departments, .25 FTE in the Bursar's Office,
and 1.5 FTEs in the Payroll Department) are required University-wide
to distribute paper checks and earnings statements to employees and
stipend recipients. An estimate of the personnel costs associated with
payroll distribution are:
Academic Departments (6 FTEs) $150,000
Bursar's Office (.25 FTE) 6,252
Payroll Department (1.5 FTEs) 37,500
Total Annual Cost $193,752
Clearly, issuing paper checks is costly to the University not only in terms of
actual dollars, but also in terms of personnel time and effort.
Recommendation
Based on the analysis of payroll distribution, the Direct Deposit Team
recommends that direct deposit become mandatory for all salaried and
wage employees, with the exception of UVA Temps and stipend recipients.
UVA Temps are excluded from this recommendation because of the constant
turnover in this work pool. Stipend recipients are excluded because it
is believed that they may have significantly different banking needs/habits
than employees. In addition, stipend payments are currently distributed
only by U.S. mail or direct deposit. As a result, distribution of stipend
payments is not a burden at the departmental level.
The net effects of this recommendation will be:
- A reduction/elimination of the payroll distribution tasks that are
currently the responsibility of departmental personnel.
- A decrease in banking costs incurred by the University because direct
deposit transactions are cheaper to process than paper checks.
- An increase in central department costs. The Payroll Department will
need to hire an additional FTE because of the increased workload resulting
from mandatory direct deposit. The estimated annual cost for this FTE
is $28,000.
Implementation
Implementation of this plan will begin on July 1, 1997. Because of the
increased numbers of people who will be signing up for direct deposit,
it will be necessary to hire one additional FTE for the Payroll Department.
Enrollment of employees in direct deposit will be handled in the following
manner:
- New salaried employees will sign up for direct deposit during new
employee orientation. No exceptions to this direct deposit policy will
be made for new salaried employees.
- New wage employees will sign up for direct deposit at the Employment
Services Office when they are filling out other required employment
paperwork (e.g., tax forms, I-9 form). As is the case with new salaried
employees, no exceptions to the direct deposit policy will be made for
new wage employees.
- Existing employees (salaried and wage) will be informed of the direct
deposit requirement through a letter sent on July 1, 1997. This letter
will inform employees of 1) the new policy, 2) the plans to close all
departmental distribution points and 3) the consequences of not complying
(i.e., that they will have to pick up paychecks at a central distribution
point in Carruthers Hall if they do not enroll in direct deposit). Because
there are currently more employees receiving paper checks than could
be served at the central distribution point, it will be necessary to
close the departmental distribution points in three stages. Employees
will be separated into three groups based on the vice presidential areas
of the University (Office of the Executive Vice President & Chief
Financial Officer, Office of the Vice President & Provost for Health
Sciences, and Office of the Vice President & Provost). Each group
of employees will be given a deadline by which they must sign up for
direct deposit. These deadlines correspond to the dates on which certain
departmental distribution points will be closed. The suggested deadlines
are as follows:
January 1, 1998 -Employees (faculty, classified staff, and wage) under
the purview of the Office of the Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Leonard Sandridge, Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer).
April 1, 1998 - Employees (faculty, classified staff, and wage) under
the purview of the Office of the Vice President and Provost for Health
Sciences (Robert Cantrell, Vice President & Provost).
July 1, 1998 - Employees (faculty, classified staff, and wage) under
the purview of the Office of the Vice President and Provost (Peter Low,
Vice President & Provost). Employees (faculty, classified staff,
and wage) who do not enroll in direct deposit by their respective deadlines
will be required to go to the central distribution point (the Bursar's
Office in Carruthers Hall) to pick up their paychecks. By July 1, 1998,
it is expected that the central distribution point will be fully operational.
Earnings Statement Distribution
Each time a payroll payment is made to an employee or stipend recipient,
a corresponding earnings statement is produced by the Payroll Department.
Preparation and distribution of earnings statements have proved to be
an extremely labor intensive task at the University. The charge of the
Direct Deposit Team was to analyze the current situation and make suggestions
for improvement.
Analysis of Current Situation
The Direct Deposit Team analyzed the two mechanisms currently being
used to deliver earnings statements to employees - hand delivery by
departmental personnel and pick-up by the employee. The problems found
in the current situation are:
- It is too labor intensive at both the University and departmental
levels.
- Employees do not always receive earnings statements in a consistent
or timely manner.
The Direct Deposit Team also analyzed three additional delivery mechanisms (electronic
mail notification, messenger mail delivery, and US mail delivery) to
determine whether there was a better delivery system available for use
by the University.
Recommendation
After analyzing the five delivery mechanisms listed above, the Direct
Deposit Team recommends that the University use US mail to deliver earnings
statements to employees. In addition, the team recommends that the University
use an outside vendor to process the mailing of the earnings statements.
The advantages of using US mail and outside vendor processing are:
- Employees would have to keep a current address on file with the Payroll
Department in order to receive their earnings statements.
- All employees would receive earnings statements via the same delivery
mechanism (i.e., it would standardize the system).
- Personnel in the Payroll Department would no longer have to process
the earnings statements. The outside vendor would coordinate the printing,
sorting, bundling, and mailing of the earnings statements.
- It would eliminate the need for departmental personnel to distribute
earnings statements. This is essential because of the plans to eliminate
departmental distribution points when mandatory direct deposit is implemented.
The University would incur an annual incremental cost of $75,372 if this recommendation
is implemented. The Direct Deposit Team firmly believes that the cost
can be justified by the many advantages that will be gained.
Implementation
It is recommended that the shift to US mail delivery of earnings statements
begin on July 1, 1997. Prior to this date, the University will need
to solicit bids from vendors which specialize in mail processing. In
addition, the University will need to verify all employee addresses
prior to implementation.
Background & Objective
The Direct Deposit Team was created to expand on the efforts of another Process
Simplification Team, the Check Distribution Team. The Check Distribution
Team analyzed the distribution of payroll payments and earnings statements
to all wage employees. The conclusions reached by that team were that
1) it should be mandatory for all wage employees to sign up for direct
deposit of their paychecks and 2) the University should examine the
feasibility of using US mail for delivery of earnings statements.
The objective of the Direct Deposit Team was to analyze the current processes by which
payroll payments and earnings statements are distributed to all employees
(salaried, wage, and UVA Temps) and stipend recipients. These distribution
processes are currently very labor intensive, especially at the departmental
level. Based on the findings of the team, recommendations will be made
on ways to streamline the distribution of both payroll payments and
earnings statements.
Payroll Distribution
Current Payroll Distribution Methods
The University processes approximately 18,900 payroll payments and 1,700
stipend payments per month. These payments are distributed among four
main categories of recipients: salaried employees, wage employees, UVA
Temps, and stipend recipients.
1. Salaried Employees
Salaried employees are paid either on a monthly or a semi-monthly pay
schedule. During an average month, there are 7,000 salaried employees,
of which 6,000 (86%) are paid monthly and 1,000 (14%) are paid semimonthly
Salaried employees receive their payroll payments by one of two mechanisms:
1) direct deposit (electronic funds transfer) into an account at a financial
institution designated by the employee or 2) issuance of a paper check
to the employee. The first mechanism, direct deposit, is utilized by
approximately 93% of salaried employees paid monthly and 56% of salaried
employees paid semimonthly Those employees not participating in direct
deposit must pick up a paper check on or after payday at a designated
location in the University (typically the employees home department).
Currently, 7% of salaried employees paid monthly and 44% of salaried
employees paid semimonthly are still compensated with paper checks.
Beginning in January 1995, it became a University requirement that all
new salaried employees sign up for direct deposit. Prior to this mandate,
however, employees could choose the method by which they were paid.
If delayed payroll is implemented and all salaried employees are switched to a
semimonthly pay schedule, the total number of semimonthly payroll payments
will increase substantially. This, in turn, will increase the number
of paper checks issued per month. These changes are compared to the
current situation in the following table.
|
Table I. Salaried Employees (Per Month) |
| Current Situation: |
| Payment Schedule |
Total # of payments/month |
Direct Deposit
# of % of Total transactions Payments |
Paper Checks
# checks % of Total issued Payments |
| Monthly |
6,000 |
5,580 |
93% |
420 |
7% |
| Semimonthly |
1,900 |
1,064 |
56% |
836 |
44% |
| Salary Overtime |
1,100 |
792 |
72% |
308 |
28% |
| Totals |
9,000 |
7,436 |
83% |
1,564 |
17% |
| After Delayed Payroll: |
| Totals |
15,000 |
13,016 |
87% |
1,984 |
13% |
2. Wage Employees
Payroll distribution to wage employees, as noted previously, was studied
extensively by the Check Distribution Team. Current figures show that
of 5,400 wage employees, 2,600 (43%) are paid monthly and 2,800 (52%)
are paid bi-weekly. Participation of wage employees in direct deposit
is significantly lower than that of salaried employees. Only 49% of
wage employees paid monthly and 48% of wage employees paid biweekly
are signed up for direct deposit. The remainder of wage employees are
issued paper checks. It is important to note, however, that direct deposit
was only recently made available to wage employees. Beginning in January
1996, wage employees were given the option to sign up for direct deposit.
Unlike new salaried employees, however, new wage employees are not currently
required to participate in direct deposit as a condition of employment.
Wage payroll payments are summarized in Table II.
|
Table II. Wage Employees (Per Month) |
| Payment Schedule |
Total # of payments/month |
Direct Deposit
# of % of Total transactions Payments |
Paper Checks
# checks % of Total issued Payments |
| Monthly |
2,600 |
1,274 |
49% |
1,326 |
51% |
| Biweekly |
5,900 |
2,832 |
48% |
3,068 |
52% |
| Totals |
8,500 |
4,106 |
48% |
4,394 |
52% |
It is important to note that wage employees will not be affected by delayed payroll.
In addition, many wage employees (e.g. graduate teaching assistants
(GTAs) and graduate research assistants (GRAs)) will remain on a monthly
pay schedule even after delayed payroll takes effect.
3. UVA Temps
UVA temps are encouraged to utilize the direct deposit system, but are
not required to do so at the present time. There are, on average, 1400
payments issued to temporary employees each month. Approximately 50%
of these payments are direct deposited.
4. Stipend Recipients
Approximately 20,400 stipend payments are distributed each year. This
indicates that, on average, there are approximately 1,700 stipend payments
issued per month. Stipend recipients have the choice of receiving their
stipend payments either through direct deposit or through issuance of
a paper check. At the present time, only 26% of stipend payments are
processed through the direct deposit system. The remainder of stipend
payments (74%) are issued in the form of a paper check. Because these
checks are processed through Accounts Payable, they are sent directly
to the recipients home addresses via US mail.
|
Table III. Stipend Recipients (Per Month) |
| |
Total # of payments/month |
Direct Deposit
# of % of Total Payments/Month Payments |
Paper Checks
# of checks % of Total issued Payments |
| |
1,700 |
442 |
26% |
1,258 |
74% |
Labor & Cost Analysis of Current Distribution System
The current distribution system is labor intensive and costly for the University.
The costs and labor requirements of the current system are summarized
below:
1. Banking Costs
An analysis of banking costs reveals that it is more expensive to pay
employees and stipend recipients by paper check than through direct
deposit. Paper checks cost 3.665 cents each and the bank charge to process
each check is 7.5 cents, resulting in a total cost of 11.165 cents per
check. The bank charge to process each direct deposit transaction item
is 5.4 cents. Therefore, it costs 5.77 cents more to issue a paper check
than to process a direct deposit transaction. The University currently
spends a total of $1,191 per month to issue paper checks. If all employees
and stipend recipients were paid through the direct deposit system,
the University would save $765 per month. After implementation of delayed
payroll, the monthly cost to issue paper checks will increase to $1,238.
The University could save $789 if these payments were made by direct
deposit instead of paper check. Table IV summarizes these incremental
monthly costs incurred by the University in issuing paper checks. It
should be noted that the cost of issuing paper checks to stipend recipients
is considerably more expensive because a postage cost is also incurred
to mail the check to their homes.
| Table IV. Incremental Monthly Costs to Issue Paper Checks
|
| Current costs: |
| Payment Type |
Paper Checks
Total #
Checks/Month Incremental Cost/Month
|
| Monthly Salaried |
420 |
$ 24 |
| Semimonthly Salaried |
836 |
48 |
| Salary Overtime |
308 |
18 |
| Biweekly Wage |
3,068 |
177 |
| Monthly Wage |
1,326 |
77 |
| UVA Temps |
700 |
40 |
| Stipend Payments |
1,258 |
Check Costs: 73
Postage Costs: 308 |
| Total Monthly Cost |
7,916 |
$765 |
| Costs after Delayed Payroll |
| Total Monthly Cost |
8,336 |
$789 |
2. Academic Department and Other Operating Unit Costs
A total of 6 FTEs are required University-wide to distribute paper checks
and earnings statements to employees. A rough estimate of the total
salary paid to these FTEs is $150,000 (assuming that the average salary
is $20,000 plus fringe benefits of $5,000). It should be noted that
this figure of 6 FTEs is an estimate of the total effort spent on this
activity by many individuals throughout the University. It should not
be interpreted as a reflection of work done by only 6 people. Implementation
of delayed payroll will increase the number of FTEs needed to distribute
payroll payments and earnings statements to 7.
3. Central Department Personnel Costs
Payroll Department
The Payroll Department currently requires 1.5 FTEs to process direct
deposit transactions and earnings statements.
Bursar's Office
The Bursar's Office currently requires .25 FTE for paycheck and earnings
statement distribution.
Recommendation:
The team recommends that participation in direct deposit be required
of all employees, except UVA Temps and stipend recipients. This recommendation
will affect both new and existing employees.
- New Employees -
- Since January 1995, all new salaried employees have
been required to sign up for direct deposit during new employee orientation.
The same policy should be instituted for new wage employees. Participation
in direct deposit is currently much lower among wage employees than
among salaried employees. This difference is due, in part, to the fact
that participation is still optional for wage employees. Therefore,
the team recommends that all new wage employees be required to sign
up for direct deposit.
- Existing Employees -
- A major focus of this proposal is shifting existing
salaried and wage employees to a direct deposit system. Currently, 17%
of all payments to salaried employees and 52% of all payments to wage
employees are made with paper checks. The team recommends that employees
who are presently receiving paper checks be required to switch to the
direct deposit system.
Benefits of 100% Participation in Direct Deposit
- 100% participation in direct deposit by salaried and wage employees
would represent an annual bank cost savings of $4,128 to the University
before implementation of delayed payroll and $4,416 after implementation.
- Electronic direct deposit requires more effort in the University Payroll
Department than processing paper checks. Between handling sign up, file
maintenance and post payday research and corrections, it is estimated
that at least 1 additional FTE would be required (Attachment A). There
would, however, be a corresponding decrease across the University of
6 FTEs because departmental employees would no longer be required to
hand out paper checks and earnings statements. In essence, this means
that those employees responsible for distribution in the departments
would now be able to direct their attention to other duties.
Obstacles to Recommendation
- New Employees -
- The team does not anticipate that sign-up of new
employees will be problematic. It will be explained to new employees
that sign-up for direct deposit is a condition of employment and that
paychecks will not be distributed by any other mechanism. It is this
teams recommendation that no exceptions be made for new employees.
- Existing Employees -
- It is inevitable that some employees will object
to signing up for direct deposit. There are a couple of reasons for
this resistance: 1) some employees do not have and/or do not want a
bank account; and 2) some employees are hesitant to give the University
access to their bank accounts. To address the second concern, the team
has decided to rewrite a portion of the direct deposit sign-up form
(see Attachment B). This rewrite will further clarify the situations
in which the University would be permitted to make adjustments to an
employee's bank account. It is anticipated that even after the rewrite,
however, there will still be some employees who refuse to sign up for
direct deposit. It should be noted that while all salaried and wage
employees (except UVA Temps) will be expected to participate in direct
deposit as a condition of employment, this team does not advocate firing
individuals who refuse to participate. Based on the analysis of this
team, however, it is clear that the University cannot continue to provide
the same level of service to these employees who will not sign up for
direct deposit. As noted throughout this document, distribution of paper
checks has become a very burdensome task throughout the University,
especially at the departmental level. Therefore, the team recommends
the elimination of all departmental distribution points and the establishment
of a central distribution point (the Bursars Office in Carruthers
Hall) where employees will have to pick up their paychecks if they do
not sign up for direct deposit. At the present time, however, there
are more employees receiving paper checks than could possibly be served
at a central distribution point. As a result, it will be necessary to
close the departmental distribution points in stages. The process by
which these departmental distribution points will be closed is explained
in the Implementation section of this proposal.
Exceptions to Recommendation
The team has decided not to require mandatory direct deposit of the
following types of payments:
- Payroll Payments to UVA Temps. UVA Temps should be excluded from the
direct deposit mandate. There is a very high turnover in this work pool.
In fact, it is not uncommon for some temporary employees to work for
only one day. Based on this information, team members have concluded
that it is not worthwhile to insist on direct deposit for temporary
employees. Of course, all UVA Temps will continue to have the option
of selecting direct deposit. Temps who choose to receive paper checks
will continue to pick them up at the Employment Services Office in the
Michie Building between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
- Stipend Payments. The team believes that stipend recipients may have
significantly different banking needs and habits from those of employees
and that further examination is necessary before a recommendation of
mandatory direct deposit can be made for them.
- Special Payments. There will be times when issuance of a paper check
is unavoidable. For example, a new employees first payroll payment
is often a paper check. Another instance in which a manual check may
have to be issued is if an employee changes the account to which direct
deposits are made. There may not be sufficient time to update the direct
deposit system before payday. In this case, payroll would have to manually
produce a check to pay the employee on time. Manual checks issued under
such special circumstances would have to be picked up by the employee
at the Bursars Office in Carruthers Hall between the hours of
8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Implementation:
It is recommended that implementation of the plan begin on July 1, 1997.
The University will need to have two implementation plans: one for new
employees and one for existing employees.
- New Employees -
- As noted previously, it is currently a condition
of employment that all new salaried employees (faculty and classified
staff) sign up for direct deposit. This condition of employment will
need to be extended to include all wage employees, with the exception
of UVA Temps. Sign up for new salaried employees should continue to
be coordinated during new employee orientation. Direct deposit sign
up for new wage employees will be conducted in the Employment Services
Office when the employee fills out other required employment paperwork
(i.e. tax forms, I-9 form). Sign up for student wage employees will
be handled at the departmental level.
- Existing Employees -
- On approximately July 1, 1997, a packet will
be sent to all salaried (faculty and classified staff) and wage employees
who are not signed up for direct deposit of their paychecks. This packet
will contain 1) a letter announcing the new direct deposit requirement,
2) a fact sheet outlining the benefits of direct deposit (Attachment
C), and 3) a direct deposit sign-up sheet. The letter will fully explain
the new policy and the manner in which it will be implemented. Existing
employees will be separated into three groups which are based on the
three vice presidential areas of the University (Office of the Executive
Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, Office of the Vice President
& Provost for Health Sciences, and Office of the Vice President
& Provost). Each group of employees will be given a deadline by
which they must sign up for direct deposit. These deadlines correspond
to the dates on which certain departmental distribution points will
be closed. Employees who do not sign up for direct deposit by their
respective deadlines will have to go to the central distribution point
to pick up future paychecks. The recommended deadlines for the employee
groups are as follows:
January 1, 1998 -Employees (faculty, classified staff, and wage) under
the purview of the Office of the Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Leonard Sandridge, Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer).
April 1, 1998 -Employees (faculty, classified staff, and wage) under
the purview of the Office of the Vice President and Provost for the
Health Sciences Center (Robert Cantrell, Vice President & Provost).
July 1, 1998 -Employees (faculty, classified staff, and wage) under
the purview of the Office of the Vice President and Provost (Peter Low,
Vice President & Provost).
Successful implementation of the direct deposit policy will be highly dependent
on the assistance and support of departmental personnel who are responsible
for handing out paychecks. These personnel will be asked to: 1) encourage
employees to sign up for direct deposit; 2) provide assistance to employees
who need help filling out the direct deposit form; 3) remind employees
of the date when their departmental distribution points will close;
and 4) inform employees of the consequences of not complying with the
direct deposit requirement (i.e. that they will have to go to the central
distribution point to pick up their paychecks).
By July 1, 1998, all departmental distribution points will be closed and the
central distribution point will be fully operational. The Bursars
Office, in Carruthers Hall, will be the central paycheck distribution
point for all employees who have not signed up for direct deposit. Checks
will be available at this location from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday. Employees will be expected to go to Carruthers Hall on their
own time (e.g. lunch hour) to pick up their paychecks. In addition,
employees will be required to pick up their own paychecks (i.e. they
can not send someone else to pick up their checks). Employees who complain
about these inconveniences will be advised to sign up for direct deposit.
Earnings Statement Distribution
Background
Each time a payroll payment is made to an employee or a stipend recipient,
a corresponding earnings statement is produced by the Payroll Department.
An earnings statement is a record of an employees gross pay, deductions,
and net pay for a specific pay period. Preparation of earnings statements
for delivery to employees has proved to be a very labor-intensive task
at both the University and departmental levels. A total of 7.75 FTEs
are involved in the preparation and distribution of earnings statements.
The steps required to prepare these statements for distribution are
detailed below:
- The Payroll Department prints, sorts and bundles the earnings statements
by home department codes.
- The earnings statements are then either: 1) picked up in Carruthers
Hall by a home department representative or 2) hand delivered to the
home department by a courier from University Mail Services.
The home departments distribute the earnings statements to employees.
It is up to each home department to determine how the earnings statements
will be distributed to employees.
There are currently two mechanisms used by home departments to distribute earnings
statements to employees -hand delivery and pickup by the employee.
There are three additional mechanisms, electronic mail, messenger mail,
and US mail, which could be utilized to deliver these statements. The
charge of this team was to: 1) analyze these five delivery mechanisms
and 2) recommend the most costand labor-efficient method.
It should be noted that the analysis and recommendation that follows is intended
only to address distribution to employees. Stipend recipients with direct
deposit will continue to be notified of their stipend payments through
electronic mail. Stipend recipients not signed up for direct deposit
will continue to receive their stipend payments and related documents
through US mail.
Earnings Statement Distribution Options:
- Hand Delivery
Some departments appoint an individual to be responsible for hand delivering
the earnings statements to employees. Obviously, this is only feasible
in smaller departments, and even then, it is a very time-consuming task.
- Employee Pickup
Departments that are unable to hand deliver designate a location where
employees may pick up their earnings statements. The drawback to this
delivery mechanism is that it requires a departmental employee to be
present at the pickup location at all times.
- Electronic Mail Notification
- Electronic mail is not presently being utilized to deliver earnings
statements to employees. It is, however, an appealing means of delivery.
A program could be written to interface the computer which produces
earnings statements with the electronic mail system. With the exception
of the set-up of the system, this would be a cost
- and labor-efficient
means of delivering earnings statements to employees. At the present
time, however, this is not a viable option because:
- There are concerns about the privacy of information sent through electronic
mail.
- There are a significant number of employees who either don't have
access to a computer or are not computer literate.
These problems would have to be addressed before e-mail could be utilized
as the delivery system for employees earnings statements.
4. Messenger Mail Delivery
Preparation of earnings statements for delivery through messenger mail
would be very labor intensive. Because of constraints in the computer
system which produces the earnings statements, it is not possible to
address these statements to messenger mail addresses. As a result, the
earnings statements would have to be sorted and bundled twice -once
in the Payroll Department and once in the home department. In the Payroll
Department, the earnings statements would be sorted and bundled according
to home department code. Once the home departments received the earnings
statements, they would have to be addressed, sorted, and bundled according
to messenger mail addresses. Processing these documents twice would
obviously be inefficient and could result in unavoidable delivery delays.
It is important that earnings statements are available to employees
on payday. As a result, the team cannot recommend using messenger mail
to deliver earnings statements.
5. US Mail Delivery
Employees do not receive earnings statements through US mail at the
present time. The team has explored, however, whether US mail should
become the standard mode of delivery for all employee earnings statements.
One advantage of switching to US mail delivery is that employees would
have to keep a current address on file with the Payroll Department.
Although employees are supposed to notify the Payroll Department when
they have a new address, it has been a problem getting these updated
addresses. The team believes that this would cease to be a problem if
earnings statements were mailed to employees homes. Another advantage
is that it would standardize the means of delivery throughout the University
and insure that all employees receive prompt notification of their earnings.
Finally, use of US mail for delivery would eliminate the need for departmental
personnel to distribute earnings statements. This is in keeping with
one of the main goals of this proposal, which is to eliminate the role
of departmental personnel in distribution of payroll payments and earnings
statements.
If this means of delivery is selected, there are two options on how to process
the mailing. Either the University could process the mail in-house or
it could hire an outside vendor to handle the processing. A cost analysis
of in-house vs. outside vendor processing follows.
Cost Analysis: In-House Processing
If the University elected to process the mailing in-house, it would
have to insure that adequate labor, machinery, and software were on
hand to prepare the mailing. In order to be eligible for bulk postage
rates, the University would have to prepare the mailing in accordance
with the following US Postal Service requirements: 1) each item would
have to be delivery point bar coded and 2) all outgoing mail would have
to be sorted and bundled by postal code. The University would have to
purchase CASS and PAVE software to support, validate, and evaluate the
coding and presorting of the mailing at an approximate cost of $7,000
per year. The labor costs associated with processing the mailing would
be difficult to determine until the system was actually in place. However,
an initial estimate of the labor costs would be $6,250 per year for
.25 FTE. The postage cost to mail each earnings statement would be $0.245.
Using the information outlined above, a rough estimate of the monthly
cost to process this mailing internally, both before and after implementation
of delayed payroll, would be:
|
Proposed Cost
Before Delayed Payroll |
Proposed Cost
After Delayed Payroll |
| Postage Costs: |
|
|
| Monthly Salaried |
$1,470 |
$0 |
| Semimonthly Salaried |
466 |
466 |
| Overtime-Salaried |
270 |
270 |
| Biweekly Wage |
1,446 |
1,446 |
| Monthly Wage |
637 |
637 |
| UVA Temps |
172 |
172 |
| Software Costs: |
583 |
583 |
| Labor Costs: |
521 |
521 |
| Paper Costs: |
125 |
175 |
| strong>Total Monthly Cost: |
$5,690 |
$7,210 |
| Total Annual Cost: |
$68,280 |
$86,520 |
Cost Analysis: Outside Vendor Processing
There are many vendors which provide mail processing services. To gain
the most from outside processing of earnings statements, the University
would need to find a vendor that could provide the following services:
- Receipt of earnings statements via modem
- Printing of earnings statements
- Supplying paper and envelopes
- Application of delivery point barcode to each item (US Postal Service
requirement for bulk postage rate)
- Sorting of items by postal code (US Postal Service requirement for
bulk postage rate)
- Application of postage to envelopes
- Delivery to US Post Office
An estimate of the cost for full-service processing of mail by an outside vendor,
based on an informal quote obtained from a mailing services vendor,
would be $0.245 per item to cover postage costs and $0.10 per item to
cover processing costs. A rough estimate of the monthly cost to the
University would be:
|
Proposed Cost
Before Delayed Payroll |
Proposed Cost
After Delayed Payroll |
| Postage & Processing Costs: |
|
|
| Monthly Salaried |
$ 2,070 |
$ 0 |
| Semimonthly Salaried |
656 |
4,796 |
| Overtime-Salaried |
380 |
380 |
| Biweekly Wage |
2,036 |
2,036 |
| Monthly Wage |
897 |
897 |
| UVATemps |
242 |
242 |
| Total Monthly Cost: |
$6,281 |
$8,351 |
|
Total Annual Cost: |
$75,372 |
$100,212 |
The main advantages of enlisting the services of an outside vendor are that:
1) the University would avoid the labor costs associated with processing
the mail; 2) the University would not need to purchase any special software
or equipment; and 3) inserts with important announcements for employees
could be included with each statement.
Recommendation
In order to streamline the process of earning statement distribution, the Direct
Deposit Team recommends using US mail for delivery of earnings statements.
Utilization of this system would insure that all earnings statements
are processed and received by employees in a timely and consistent manner.
In addition, use of this system would enable University personnel who
are responsible for earnings statement distribution to redirect their
efforts to other tasks.
If US Mail delivery is adopted by the University, this team strongly recommends
that an outside vendor perform the processing and mailing of these items.
When comparing the postage and processing costs between using a mailing
service vendor and processing this mail in-house, it appears that use
of an outside vendor would cost only $591 more per month under the current
system and $1,141 more per month after delayed payroll. The team requests
that the University fund the total cost ($75,372 before implementation
of delayed payroll and $100,212 after implementation) of an outside
vendor from central sources beginning with the 1998 fiscal year.
Implementation
Upon approval of this plan by the Process Owners Group and the Steering
Committee, the next step in the process would be solicitation of bids
from vendors.
It is recommended that the shift to US mail delivery of earnings statements begin on July
1, 1997. This will allow time for the Payroll Department to verify all
employee addresses prior to implementation. In addition, funds will
not be available to implement this program until the 1998 fiscal year.
Conclusion
The Direct Deposit Team undertook an extensive review of payroll and earnings statement
distribution with three goals in mind: 1) to decrease costs; 2) to increase
efficiency; and 3) to reduce personnel needs. To that end, the team
recommends that direct deposit become mandatory for all employees (except
UVA Temps and stipend recipients) and that earnings statements be processed
by an outside vendor for delivery to employees through US mail. If these
recommendations are adopted together, the effects will be as follows:
1. Decrease in Costs: A cost savings of approximately $4,230 per month
will be achieved through implementation of the teams recommendations.
Table V summarizes these savings.
|
Table V. Summary of Cost Savings (Per Month) |
| Cost Categories |
Current Monthly Costs |
Proposed Costs with Implementation |
Difference (Savings) |
| Bank Costs: |
| Salaried Employees |
$577 |
$487 |
$(90) |
| Wage Employees |
713 |
459 |
(254) |
| UVA Temps |
116 |
116 |
0 |
| Stipend Recipients |
164 |
164 |
0 |
| Personnel Costs: |
| Departments |
6.00 FTE$12,500 |
0.00 FTE$0 |
$(12,500) |
| Bursar's Office |
0.25 FTE$521 |
0.25 FTE$521 |
0 |
| Payroll Dept |
1.50 FTE$3,125 |
2.50 FTE$5,458 |
2,333 |
Cost to Mail Earnings
Statements Using Vendor |
0 |
6,281 |
6,281 |
| Total Monthly Costs |
$17,716 |
$13,486 |
$(4,230) |
| Total Annual Costs |
$212,592 |
$161,832 |
$(50,760) |
- Increase in Efficiency: The University manually distributes approximately 26,000
checks and earnings statements per month. After implementation of delayed
payroll, this number will increase to 32,600. Under the recommendations
proposed by the Direct Deposit Team, the number of documents distributed
per month could be reduced to approximately 2,700.
- Reduction in Personnel Needs: There will be an increased labor need of 1 FTE in
the Payroll Department, but a corresponding decrease of 6 FTEs throughout
the University.
The Direct Deposit Team is confident that the recommendations made in this proposal
will streamline the distribution systems used for payroll payments and
earnings statements. |
|